Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
Evaluation of a Modified London Protocol to Diagnose Defecation Disorders With High-Definition Anorectal Manometry
Christian Lambiase1,2, Giuseppe Chiarioni3,4, Francesco Rettura1,2,5
1Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Background:
Anorectal manometry (ARM) is useful to diagnose defecation disorders. The International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) introduced a standardized sequence of maneuvers into clinical practice to perform ARM (London Protocol). Regarding the "push" maneuver, excellent consensus among IAPWG experts was limited to the number of pushes and the interval between them. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of simplified ARM protocols featuring various combinations of different push durations (15, 10 or 5 s) and numbers of push attempts (two or three).
Methods:
High-Definition ARM (HD-ARM) tracings from 142 patients (113 females, mean aged 54.7 ± 16.9) who underwent ARM for fecal incontinence (n = 37) or constipation (n = 105) were retrospectively reviewed. HD-ARM tracings were re-evaluated based on the following modifications to the London protocol: considering only the first two pushes; considering the first ten seconds of each push; considering the first ten seconds of the first two pushes; considering the first five seconds of each push; considering the first five seconds of the first two pushes. HD-ARM reports were redrawn because of these protocol modifications and were compared with the reports obtained using the IAPGW standard protocol in terms of manometric pattern and diagnosis.
Results:
The proposed modified protocols featuring ten- or fifteen-second pushes showed an almost perfect concordance compared with the standard of practice (k = 0.97), while the modified protocols featuring 5 s pushes showed only a fair/moderate diagnostic concordance. The latter was mainly linked to a transient increase in anal pressure (lasting on average four to five seconds).
Conclusions:
Based on our results, two push efforts of ten seconds each may be enough to reach an accurate manometric diagnosis of defecation disorders. Five-second push may not be sufficient given the transient increase in anal pressure at the beginning of the push attempt. Performing only two push maneuvers of ten seconds each may reduce by 55 s the length of this cumbersome examination.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
07:38Multimodal Quantitative Phase Imaging with Digital Holographic Microscopy Accurately Assesses Intestinal Inflammation and Epithelial Wound Healing
Published on: September 13, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry