Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Systemic Racism in Canadian Healthcare: A Policy and Equity Analysis
Kola Adegoke1,2, Abimbola Adegoke1,3, Deborah Dawodu3
1Department of Health & Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Professions, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, USA.
Background:
In Canadian healthcare, systemic racism subverts commitment to universal coverage by building inequities into the system of governance, regulation, and clinical practice. Although racial disparities have been documented, little attention has been paid to how institutional structures perpetuate these inequities.
Objective:
This study critically examines the organizational aspects of racism in the Canadian healthcare system. It aims to identify structural obstacles faced by racialized patients and foreign-trained physicians and to provide policy recommendations grounded in evidence.
Methods:
The authors employed a narrative review framework for qualitative analysis of documents. Public inquiries (eg, Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Viens Report), government audits (eg, PHAC and CHRC), case files (eg, Brian Sinclair, Joyce Echaquan, and Dr. Akinbiyi), and peer-reviewed publications between 2000 and 2024 were the data sources. Thematic coding occurs across 4 areas: (1) institutional discrimination, (2) licensing and workforce exclusion, (3) patient and cultural safety, and (4) accountability gaps.
Results:
The review found continuing institutional disregard for Indigenous and Black patients, and the disparities were most marked in emergency and maternal services. Internationally educated doctors face opaque and delayed credentialing procedures, which can exacerbate workforce disparities. Case examples illustrate how system failures, including disregarding patient suffering, ignoring cultural requirements, and inadequate oversight, can lead to harm. It is a recurring pattern in which the recommended action is not taken following a review, suggesting organizational resistance to change.
Discussion:
Canadian systemic racism in health care occurs through omissions (failure to act on reform) and commissions (institutional exclusion). To tackle this, it is necessary to entrench antiracism in legislation, make cultural safety training a requirement, collect race-disaggregated data, and transform licensing routes.
Conclusion:
Universal healthcare is not equitable unless systemic racism is eliminated. Systemic changes that recalibrate healthcare governance in accordance with antiracism and equity values are necessary to provide safe and inclusive care.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:26Equity Theory
01:18Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
01:29Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...