Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
One-year mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and its relationship with the extent of myocardial
Luis A Vega-Quesada1, Néstor A Parra-Ordoñez1, Heber J Pech-Ortega2
1Department of Cardiology, High Specialty Medical Unit, Hospital de Cardiología #34 Dr. Alfonso J. Treviño Treviño, Centro Médico Nacional del Noreste, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Insights
One-year mortality after aortic valve replacement was 6%. Myocardial damage staging did not correlate with mortality, but a high Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significant risk factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a critical procedure for severe aortic valve disease.
- Understanding predictors of mortality post-AVR is essential for patient management.
- The role of myocardial damage extension in predicting outcomes after AVR requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the 1-year mortality rate in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement.
- To assess the relationship between myocardial damage extension and 1-year mortality.
- To identify clinical risk factors associated with mortality post-AVR.
Main Methods:
- An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study.
- Inclusion of 177 patients aged over 18 who underwent AVR between March 2019 and March 2021.
- Classification of patients into myocardial damage stages (0-4) to analyze 12-month mortality and associated risk factors.
Main Results:
- The overall 1-year mortality rate was 6% (11/177).
- Mortality was predominantly observed in myocardial damage stages 2 and 3.
- Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the most frequent comorbidities among deceased patients.
- A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% and a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score > 2% were identified as risk factors for mortality.
Conclusions:
- The myocardial damage extension staging did not significantly correlate with 1-year mortality after AVR.
- An STS score greater than 2% and an LVEF less than 30% are significant risk factors for mortality post-AVR.
- These findings highlight the importance of pre-operative risk assessment using established scores and cardiac function parameters.
Objective:
To determine the 1-year mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and its relationship with the myocardial damage extension scale.
Methods:
An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study was conducted. Patients over 18 years of age, of both sexes, who underwent aortic valve replacement between March 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021, were included. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the myocardial damage extension classification to determine 12-month mortality. In addition, risk factors associated with mortality, as well as clinical and sociodemographic variables, were documented.
Results:
A total of 177 patients (104 men [59%] and 73 women [41%]) were included. Distribution among myocardial damage stages was: Stage 0 (5%), stage 1 (25%), stage 2 (56%), stage 3 (8%), and stage 4 (6%). One-year mortality was 6% (11/177), predominantly in stage 2 (72%) and stage 3 (18%). Hypertension (64%) and diabetes mellitus (55%) were the most frequent comorbidities among the deceased. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score > 2% were risk factors associated with mortality.
Conclusion:
One-year mortality was 6%, predominantly in stage 2 of myocardial damage extension. The staging did not correlate with mortality after 1 year of follow-up. An STS score > 2% and LVEF < 30% are risk factors for mortality.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

