A study of three cases of acquired reactive perforating collagenosis mimicking calciphylaxis

Yu Zhao1, Xiao-Tong Xie1, Hai-Feng Ni1

  • 1Department of Nephrology, Zhong Da Hospital, Southeast University, School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.

BMC Nephrology
|November 4, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Calciphylaxis (CUA) and Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis (ARPC) are distinct conditions with similar skin lesions. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate treatment and improved patient outcomes in end-stage kidney disease.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Nephrology
  • Vascular Medicine

Background:

  • Calciphylaxis (CUA) is a rare, fatal vasculopathy in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients, marked by medial calcification and thrombosis.
  • Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis (ARPC) is a perforating dermatosis linked to systemic diseases, involving collagen elimination through the epidermis.
  • Both CUA and ARPC present with clinically similar skin lesions, complicating diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between Calciphylaxis (CUA) and Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis (ARPC).
  • To provide clinicians with insights for accurate diagnosis and management of these conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Case report detailing three instances of ARPC misdiagnosed as CUA.
  • Comparative analysis of histopathological and clinical features.

Main Results:

  • Initial misdiagnosis of ARPC as CUA occurred in three presented cases.
  • Highlighting the critical need for precise differentiation due to disparate treatment strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate diagnosis of CUA and ARPC is essential for effective treatment.
  • Distinguishing between these conditions prevents treatment delays and improves patient prognosis.
Abstract