Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Published on: June 6, 2025
Discharge one hour sooner: Comparing post-operative metrics between spinal and general anesthetics among male infants
Colton K Leavitt1, Linnea E Dixson2, Flora F Liu2
1Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, HELIX Building 5N, 30 N. Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; Intermountain Primary Children's Hospital, Department of Urology, Suite 3550, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
Insights
Spinal anesthesia (SA) significantly reduces postoperative recovery time for infant circumcision compared to general anesthesia (GA), leading to faster hospital discharge without increasing complications or operative time.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Anesthesiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Infant circumcision is a common surgical procedure.
- Anesthesia choice impacts postoperative recovery and hospital resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare postoperative recovery times for infant circumcision using spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA).
- To evaluate the impact of SA on operative times and postoperative complications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of infants undergoing outpatient surgical circumcision.
- Comparison of total postoperative time (PACU to discharge) between SA (n=88) and GA (n=105) groups.
- Analysis of secondary outcomes including OR times and 30-day complications, controlling for covariates.
Main Results:
- SA group had significantly shorter total postoperative time (39.5 min) compared to GA group (104 min; p < 0.001).
- No significant differences in total OR time, pre-surgery OR time, or surgical duration.
- SA was associated with a 65.5 min shorter PACU stay, with no increase in postoperative complications.
Conclusions:
- Spinal anesthesia facilitates faster hospital discharge for infant circumcision by over an hour compared to general anesthesia.
- SA offers potential benefits including cost savings, increased OR throughput, and reduced PACU staffing strain.
- SA is a safe and effective anesthetic option for infant circumcision, comparable to GA regarding surgical outcomes and complications.
Introduction And Background:
The aim of this study is to determine if spinal anesthesia (SA) for infant surgical circumcision results in shorter postoperative times compared to general anesthesia (GA). We hypothesized that, relative to GA, SA would have significantly shorter post-operative recovery times without increasing operative time or postoperative complications relative to GA.
Material And Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted among infants receiving an outpatient surgical circumcision in the operating room (OR). The exposure was undergoing spinal anesthesia (n = 88) relative to unexposed patients undergoing general anesthesia (n = 105). The primary outcome was the total postoperative time (in minutes) from arriving in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) to discharging from the hospital. Secondary outcomes included total time in the operating room, time from entering the operating room to starting surgery, duration of the surgery, time from the end of surgery to leaving the operating room, and 30-day postoperative complications. Covariates of interest were age, weight, ASA class, anesthesiologist, and whether adjuvant anesthetics were administered. Patient and surgical characteristics were compared using non-parametric tests of association. Mixed-effect linear regression models were fit to test the association between SA and total post-op time and other outcomes.
Results:
There were 88 male infants in the SA group and 105 male infants in the GA group; both groups were similar in age, weight, ASA class and insurance status. The unadjusted analysis demonstrated that median total postoperative time was significantly lower for the SA group (39.5 min) compared to the GA group (104 min; p < 0.001) (see figure). There was no difference in total OR time (median 51 versus 48, p = 0.1) (see figure), pre-surgery OR time (median 18 versus 18, p = 0.6) or surgical time (median 27 versus 24, p = 0.6). There was a very slight statistical difference in post-surgery OR time favoring spinal anesthesia (mean 6.5 vs. 4.8, p < 0.001). When controlling for anesthesiologist, age, weight and ASA class, patients receiving SA had a 65.5 min (p < 0.001) shorter PACU stay compared to GA. There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups.
Discussion:
When compared to GA, male infants who underwent circumcision under SA had a faster hospital discharge by over an hour without impacting surgical or total OR times or complications. This reduction in recovery time may lead to cost savings for patients and hospitals, possibly allow for higher daily OR throughput and alleviate strain on PACU nurse staffing.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...

