Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure compared to open repair for recurrent inguinal hernias in children:

Ko Miyazaki1, Naonori Kawakubo2, Shinichi Noguchi3

  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Ehime, Japan.

PubMed

Insights

Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) for pediatric recurrent inguinal hernias had a 10.2% re-recurrence rate. Open repair showed no recurrence, though LPEC offered shorter surgical times.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) is standard for pediatric inguinal hernias.
  • Studies on LPEC for pediatric recurrent inguinal hernias (PRIHs) are limited due to low recurrence rates.
  • This multicenter study compares LPEC with open repair for PRIHs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare surgical outcomes of LPEC versus open repair for PRIHs.
  • To evaluate re-recurrence rates, surgical duration, and complications.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter retrospective study of patients under 15 years old from 2012-2021.
  • Included patients who underwent LPEC or open repair for PRIHs across 13 institutions.
  • Primary outcome: re-recurrence rate; Secondary outcomes: surgical time, postoperative complications.

Main Results:

  • Analyzed 74 patients: 59 in LPEC group, 15 in open repair group.
  • Re-recurrence occurred in 10.2% of the LPEC group versus 0% in the open group (p=0.337).
  • LPEC group had significantly shorter surgical times (p<0.001) and one surgical site infection.

Conclusions:

  • LPEC for PRIHs demonstrated a 10.2% re-recurrence rate, with no recurrences in the open repair group.
  • While LPEC offers shorter operative times, its re-recurrence rate warrants further investigation.
  • Larger studies and improved LPEC techniques are needed for PRIHs.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos