Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

700
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
700
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

258
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
258

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking Attentional Modulation to Auditory Attention Decoding: Using Colocated Stimuli With a Fixed Temporal Structure.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Psychophysical and Psychometric Properties of Visual Analog Scales: An Auditory-Perceptual Study Applied to Hypokinetic Dysarthria.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Immediate to longer-term neurophysiological impact of acute neural network disruption.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

An Augmented Reality Audio-Motor Training Game for Improving Speech-in-Noise Perception: Single-Arm Pilot Feasibility Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Influence of extrusion direction on hydroxyapatite coating formation, corrosion and mechanical performance of a Mg-Zn-Zr alloy.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2026
Same author

Emergence of mobile RND-type efflux pump gene cluster tmexCD-toprJ on a broad-host-range IncC plasmid in Shewanella species in a water environment.

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

791

Differential electroencephalography responses in speech perception between native and non-native speakers.

Luong Do Anh Quan1, Le Thi Trang1, Inyong Choi2

  • 1Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|November 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Non-native speakers process speech differently, relying more on acoustic cues. This study used electroencephalography (EEG) to reveal distinct neural strategies for native versus non-native language processing.

Keywords:
bottom-up acoustic featuresneural trackingpassive listeningphoneme-related potentialtemporal response function

More Related Videos

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.8K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

791
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.8K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • Listeners utilize varied neural strategies for native and non-native language.
  • Speech processing involves encoding acoustic to linguistic information differently based on language experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate neural response differences in native English and Korean speakers during passive listening.
  • Compare how the brain processes native versus non-native speech.
  • Examine the role of acoustic versus linguistic features in speech perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized electroencephalography (EEG) to record brain activity.
  • Employed Temporal Response Functions (TRFs) to analyze neural tracking of speech features (envelope, phoneme onset, surprisal, semantic dissimilarity).
  • Applied Phoneme-Related Potentials (PRPs) to assess phonemic-level processing.

Main Results:

  • Non-native speakers exhibited stronger neural tracking of the speech envelope.
  • No group differences were found for higher-level linguistic features in TRF analyses.
  • PRP analyses indicated distinct patterns, with non-native speakers showing heightened peaks for phoneme categories.

Conclusions:

  • Non-native listeners appear to depend more on bottom-up acoustic cues during passive speech perception.
  • TRFs and PRPs serve as neural markers for language-dependent speech processing.
  • Language experience significantly influences neural strategies for speech comprehension.