Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Status of Physician-Ordered Advance Code in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Kensuke Takabayashi1,2, Shouji Kitaguchi3, Tetsuhisa Kitamura4
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science Shiga Japan.
Insights
Physician Ordered Advance Code (PAC) in Japan reflects poor acute heart failure (AHF) patient status and higher mortality. Improving shared decision-making and aligning PAC with patient values is crucial for better care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Physician Ordered Advance Code (PAC) guides treatment for acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan.
- Limited data exists on PAC's clinical characteristics, decision-making, and outcomes in Japanese AHF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical characteristics, decision-making processes, and mortality outcomes associated with PAC in Japanese AHF patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,203 AHF patients across multiple Japanese centers.
- Comparison of clinical characteristics and mortality between patients with and without PAC orders.
Main Results:
- PAC patients were older, more female, had lower ADL scores, and higher cognitive impairment prevalence.
- PAC decisions primarily involved family (7.3% of patients directly informed), with orders finalized within 5 days for most.
- PAC designation correlated with higher in-hospital and 2-year mortality rates.
Conclusions:
- PAC reflects poor clinical status and is linked to significantly worse mortality outcomes in AHF.
- Enhancing shared decision-making and aligning PAC with patient values is essential for optimizing care.
Background:
The physician ordered advance code (PAC), a treatment code used in Japanese hospitals based on the physician orders for life sustaining treatment paradigm, plays a crucial role in guiding treatment decisions for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). However, data on the clinical characteristics, decision-making processes, and outcomes associated with PAC in Japanese patients are limited.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,203 AHF patients across multiple centers in Japan. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of PAC orders; clinical characteristics and mortality outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Patients with PAC orders were significantly older, more often female, and had lower activities of daily living scores. Cognitive impairment was markedly more prevalent in the PAC than non-PAC group. PAC decisions were primarily communicated to family members rather than to patients themselves, with only 7.3% of patients directly informed. The median time from admission to final PAC order was 2 days, with 74.1% finalized within 5 days. PAC orders frequently permitted intravenous therapies, but limited resuscitative measures in only 15% of patients. In-hospital and 2-year mortality rates were substantially higher in the PAC than non-PAC group.
Conclusions:
PAC designation reflected poor clinical status and was linked to significantly worse mortality outcome. Enhancing shared decision-making and aligning PAC with patient values are essential steps to optimize care for this vulnerable population.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers