Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

07:05
Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
Published on: September 22, 2015
10.4K
Progress in skeletal muscle tissue engineering: advancing from 3D to 4D bioprinting
Diya Pillai Babu1,2, Radhakrishnan Sreena2, Kristen Brenner1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, United States of America.
Progress in Biomedical Engineering (Bristol, England)
|November 11, 2025
Summary
This review explores 3D and 4D bioprinting for skeletal muscle tissue engineering (SMTE). Advanced biofabrication techniques offer promising alternatives to traditional muscle grafts for volumetric muscle loss injuries.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Regenerative Medicine
- Tissue Engineering
Background:
- Skeletal muscles are crucial for movement, posture, and thermoregulation.
- Severe muscle injuries, like volumetric muscle loss (VML), often require surgical intervention.
- Current treatments like functional free muscle transfer (FFMT) have limitations, including donor site morbidity and poor regeneration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review advancements in 3D and 4D bioprinting for skeletal muscle repair and regeneration.
- To highlight novel biofabrication approaches utilizing external stimuli for scaffold development.
- To discuss challenges and future perspectives for clinical translation of bioprinted scaffolds in SMTE.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on 3D and 4D bioprinting techniques for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.
- Analysis of studies employing external stimuli (magnetic, electric, thermal, humidity) for scaffold shape-shifting.
- Discussion of scaffold design principles for mimicking native tissue microarchitecture and promoting cell alignment.
Main Results:
- 3D printing and bioprinting offer viable scaffolds for skeletal muscle regeneration, guiding cell organization.
- 4D biofabrication utilizes external stimuli to achieve time-dependent shape changes in scaffolds, enhancing tissue mimicry.
- These advanced fabrication methods show potential for improved outcomes in VML injury treatment.
Conclusions:
- 3D and 4D bioprinting represent significant advancements in skeletal muscle tissue engineering.
- Novel biofabrication strategies hold promise for overcoming limitations of current treatments for VML injuries.
- Further research and development are necessary for the clinical translation of these technologies.

