Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Classifying mental stress from eye tracking data: deep learning approaches for out-of-the-lab conditions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring Attitudes Toward AI-Based Contactless Sensors in Health Among Five Stakeholder Groups: Qualitative Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Contactless Sleep Staging With Radar: A Transfer Learning Approach.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Digital health: Early steps in a digital transformation in palliative care.

Palliative medicine·2026
Same author

Acceptance, Perceived Usefulness, and Data Sharing in Mobile Health Apps Among Patients With Breast Cancer: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same author

Challenges of Standard Pediatric Epilepsy Monitoring and the Potential Benefits of Contactless Sensor Technologies: Exploratory Qualitative Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
08:22

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Published on: April 26, 2024

3.0K

PEPbench-Open, Reproducible, and Systematic Benchmarking of Automated Pre-Ejection Period Extraction Algorithms.

Robert Richer1, Julia Jorkowitz1, Sebastian Stühler1

  • 1Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab (MaD Lab), Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Psychophysiology
|November 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated pre-ejection period (PEP) extraction algorithms require cautious use due to high error rates, especially from B-point detection. PEPbench offers a new open-source framework for systematically evaluating these cardiac psychophysiology tools.

Keywords:
B‐pointECGICGPEPQ‐peakalgorithm benchmarkingdZ/dtopen science

More Related Videos

PIPEMAT-RS: Development and Validation of a Standardized MATLAB Pipeline for Resting-State EEG Preprocessing
06:51

PIPEMAT-RS: Development and Validation of a Standardized MATLAB Pipeline for Resting-State EEG Preprocessing

Published on: June 6, 2025

913
Implantation of Combined Telemetric ECG and Blood Pressure Transmitters to Determine Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Mice
09:56

Implantation of Combined Telemetric ECG and Blood Pressure Transmitters to Determine Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Mice

Published on: February 14, 2021

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
08:22

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Published on: April 26, 2024

3.0K
PIPEMAT-RS: Development and Validation of a Standardized MATLAB Pipeline for Resting-State EEG Preprocessing
06:51

PIPEMAT-RS: Development and Validation of a Standardized MATLAB Pipeline for Resting-State EEG Preprocessing

Published on: June 6, 2025

913
Implantation of Combined Telemetric ECG and Blood Pressure Transmitters to Determine Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Mice
09:56

Implantation of Combined Telemetric ECG and Blood Pressure Transmitters to Determine Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Mice

Published on: February 14, 2021

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Psychophysiology
  • Biomedical Signal Processing
  • Cardiovascular Physiology

Background:

  • The pre-ejection period (PEP) is a key cardiac parameter in psychophysiology, often used to assess sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity.
  • Automated algorithms for PEP extraction from ECG and impedance cardiography (ICG) signals exist but lack systematic benchmarking.
  • A significant barrier to progress is the absence of open-source algorithms and standardized, annotated datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce PEPbench, an open-source Python package and evaluation framework for PEP extraction algorithms.
  • To systematically benchmark various PEP extraction algorithm combinations using a standardized approach.
  • To provide the first publicly available datasets with reference annotations for Q-peaks and B-points.

Main Methods:

  • Developed PEPbench, integrating diverse Q-peak and B-point detection algorithms into comprehensive pipelines.
  • Conducted a systematic comparison of 108 distinct algorithm combinations using PEPbench.
  • Evaluated all combinations on two newly released, manually annotated datasets for Q-peaks and B-points.

Main Results:

  • Algorithm performance varied significantly, with B-point detection contributing substantial error.
  • Automated PEP extraction algorithms demonstrated relatively high error rates on a beat-to-beat basis.
  • The study underscores the need for caution when applying automated PEP extraction in real-time psychophysiological research.

Conclusions:

  • PEPbench provides a crucial open-source tool for reproducible benchmarking of PEP extraction algorithms.
  • The findings highlight the limitations of current automated PEP extraction methods, particularly for beat-to-beat analysis.
  • Encourages community contribution to foster innovation and improve the reliability of cardiac parameter extraction in psychophysiology.