Regional Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Care in Japan: Insights from the J-DOME Registry
Mitsuhiko Noda1,2, Kohjiro Ueki3, Atsushi Goto4
1Department of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Ichikawa Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan.
Introduction:
Comparing diabetes care across different regions of Japan is essential for informing future healthcare policy. Additionally, since many patients with diabetes receive treatment from non-specialist physicians, it is important to determine whether differences exist between diabetes specialists and non-specialists in terms of medical care and to identify specific areas, if any, where these differences occur.
Methods:
To investigate this, we utilized data from J-DOME (Japan Medical Association Database of Clinical Medicine), a patient registry established as a nationwide project by the Japan Medical Association. Patients with type 2 diabetes were categorized into seven regional groups based on Japan's prefectural divisions, and a regional comparison was conducted. Differences between specialists and non-specialists were also examined.
Results:
A total of 116 medical institutions encompassing 2,938 patients were included in the analysis. The nationwide mean glycated hemoglobin level was 6.96% (standard deviation [SD]: 0.46), with no statistically significant regional variations. Similarly, the nationwide mean blood pressure was 129.7/73.0 mmHg (SD: 6.1/5.7 mmHg), with no significant regional differences observed.The average rates of regular ophthalmologic visits and urinary albumin quantification testing were 63.7% (SD: 31.3) and 40.2% (SD: 38.4), respectively. These rates were significantly higher in institutions led by diabetes specialists compared to those managed by non-specialists (regular ophthalmologic visit rate: non-specialists institutions: 53.9% [SD: 33.8]; diabetes specialist institutions: 78.5% [SD: 19.5], p < 0.001; urinary albumin quantification test rate among patients without macroproteinuria: non-specialist institutions: 33.5% [SD: 39.0]; diabetes specialist institutions: 62.5% [SD: 35.5], p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
This survey revealed no significant regional differences in diabetes care. However, certain aspects of diabetes management differed significantly between diabetes specialists and non-specialist physicians.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


