Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automatic processing quality assurance program: impact on a radiology department.

L Goldman, J J Vucich, S Beech

    Radiology
    |December 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Digital Imaging Network, Picture Archival and Communication System, and Radiology Information System.

    Journal of digital imaging·2001
    Same author

    The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

    JAMA·1996
    Same author

    Changes in health after elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. A comparison of generic and specific measures.

    Medical care·1996
    Same author

    Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and occupational history. A pilot case-control study.

    Archives of neurology·1996
    Same author

    Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain.

    Circulation·1996
    Same author

    Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to emergency departments with acute chest pain.

    The New England journal of medicine·1996
    Same journal

    Machine Learning Multiorgan Analysis of Coronary CT Angiography Body Composition, Myocardial Infarction, and Mortality in the SCOT-HEART Trial.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Case 347: Tracheobronchial Smooth Muscle Atrophy and Separation.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine or <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-guided Salvage Radiotherapy Changes in Postprostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence: Secondary Analysis of the EMPIRE-2 Trial.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Pelvic MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Impact of FIGO 2023.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Sequencing Ablation and Systemic Therapy in Colorectal Liver Oligometastases: An Upfront versus Delayed Approach Nationwide Analysis.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Case 351.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    A quality assurance (QA) program can significantly reduce radiology retakes caused by processing variations. Implementing a QA program is cost-effective, improving both patient care and hospital finances.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Quality Assurance

    Background:

    • Processing variability in medical imaging can lead to repeat examinations.
    • Improper overall density is a common reason for retakes in radiology.
    • Quality assurance programs are essential for optimizing diagnostic imaging procedures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a method for evaluating processing variability in radiology.
    • To provide quantitative data on a quality assurance program's effectiveness.
    • To assess the cost-effectiveness of a QA program in a radiology department.

    Main Methods:

    • A method for evaluating processing variability was developed and applied.
    • Quantitative data was collected on a quality assurance program.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The study focused on retake rates attributed to improper overall density.

    • Main Results:

    • Processing variation was identified as the cause for 30% of retakes due to improper overall density.
    • The implemented QA program demonstrated a significant reduction in processing-related retakes.
    • The QA program proved to be highly cost-effective.

    Conclusions:

    • A robust quality assurance program can effectively minimize processing variability in radiology.
    • Implementing such a QA program leads to substantial cost savings and improved patient care.
    • Reducing retakes through QA enhances the efficiency and quality of diagnostic imaging services.