Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
Published on: February 5, 2021
Heart rate management using ivabradine in acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-matched single-center study
Meixian Chen1, Peiqi Zhong1, Chao Li1
1Department of Cardiology, 900th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, Fujian, China.
Insights
Ivabradine therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients was linked to reduced rehospitalization. This real-world data suggests potential benefits, particularly in specific subgroups, warranting further investigation for heart rate control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Real-world evidence
Background:
- The clinical utility of ivabradine for heart rate control in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is under ongoing debate.
- Real-world data is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions in diverse patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between ivabradine treatment and the risk of rehospitalization in patients following an acute myocardial infarction.
- To identify patient subgroups who may benefit most from ivabradine therapy for heart rate management post-AMI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of real-world data from 408 patients with AMI, with 76 receiving ivabradine.
- Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, log-rank tests, multivariable Cox regression, and propensity score matching (PSM).
- Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were performed to explore ivabradine's impact across various risk factors.
Main Results:
- Before PSM, ivabradine was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause rehospitalization (HR: 0.64).
- After PSM, this association was not statistically significant (HR: 0.79).
- Significant reductions in rehospitalization risk were observed in specific subgroups: females, patients with heart rate >70 bpm, Killip class >1, anterior wall MI, >1 diseased vessel, no CKD, and not on clopidogrel.
- Achieving a target heart rate at discharge was linked to lower rehospitalization (HR: 0.74).
- Multivariable analysis indicated ivabradine reduced rehospitalization risk over 12 months (aHR: 0.80).
Conclusions:
- Ivabradine therapy during hospitalization for AMI appears associated with a lower risk of all-cause rehospitalization.
- The observed benefits were more pronounced in specific patient subgroups, suggesting personalized treatment approaches.
- Further validation is required to confirm the robustness and clinical implications of these findings.
Abstract:
The therapeutic role of ivabradine in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains clinically debated. This study used real-world data to evaluate the rehospitalization risk associated with ivabradine treatment for heart rate control. Among 408 patients with AMI, 76 (18.6%) received ivabradine. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to assess the rehospitalization risk. Additionally, an interaction test evaluated ivabradine's impact on the rehospitalization risk across relevant risk factors. Multiple imputation was employed to handle missing data. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that ivabradine therapy was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause rehospitalization in patients with AMI before PSM (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44-0.91, P = 0.015), but not after (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.50-1.24, P = 0.310). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a decreased rehospitalization risk following ivabradine therapy in females (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.89, P = 0.023), and patients with heart rate > 70 bpm (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40-0.89, P = 0.011), Killip classification > 1 (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.99, P = 0.046), anterior wall myocardial infarction (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.93, P = 0.029), > 1 diseased vessel (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.93, P = 0.023), and no chronic kidney disease (CKD) (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.46-0.98, P = 0.040) or clopidogrel therapy (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90, P = 0.019). Target-range heart rate at first discharge was linked to a lower rehospitalization risk (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.96, P = 0.025). Multivariable analysis indicated that ivabradine reduced the rehospitalization risk over a 12-month follow-up (adjusted HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.96, P = 0.017). In conclusion, ivabradine therapy during hospitalization was associated with a lower risk of all-cause rehospitalization in patients with AMI. However, the robustness of our findings requires further validation.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Decreased pulse rate
There are specific risk factors that can elevate the likelihood of developing bradycardia. Advanced age is a significant factor, with...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

