Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

A Convenient Method for Extraction and Analysis with High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography of Catecholamine Neurotransmitters and Their Metabolites
Published on: March 1, 2018
Prevalence of 3,4-Methylenedioxy-α-Pyrrolidinohexanophenone (3,4-MDPHP) in 465 Suspected Intoxication Cases and
Maurizio Pasi1, Ilaria Giardini1, Eleonora Buscaglia2
1Laboratorio Ultraspecialistico di Patologia Clinica Farmacotossicologia e Sostanze d'abuso, Laboratorio Analisi Chimico Cliniche, Dipartimento di Medicina Diagnostica e di Laboratorio, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Background:
The rise of synthetic cathinones (SC), and in particular 3,4-MDPHP (3,4-methylenedioxy-α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone), is a concerning health threat. This paper represents the most extensive case series on 3,4-MDPHP suspected intoxications to date, offering a detailed analysis of its impact.
Methods:
This study presents the analytical findings for 108 hospitalized patients who tested positive for 3,4-MDPHP, out of a total of 465 subjects admitted for suspected new psychoactive substances (NPS) intoxication. Analyses were performed by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS. The potential cross-reactivity of 3,4-MDPHP with the Syva EMIT II Plus urine ecstasy immunoassay is also investigated.
Results:
3,4-MDPHP was detected in 56% of NPS positive cases. A wide range of 3,4-MDPHP concentrations was observed in both blood (1-257 ng/mL) and urine (2-32 250 ng/mL). 3,4-MDPHP was the sole detected substance in 73.1% of cases, while 26.9% involved co-consumption with other drugs of abuse, primarily cocaine. Investigations about 3,4-MDPHP cross-reactivity with Syva EMIT II Plus urine ecstasy demonstrated that unmodified 3,4-MDPHP does not trigger a positive result, but its metabolites seem to be involved in a positive cross-reaction.
Conclusion:
This study confirms the high prevalence (108/465) of 3,4-MDPHP in NPS related intoxication cases in our cohort. It is essential for clinical laboratories and emergency departments to be aware of the potential cross-reactivity in ecstasy immunoassay, as this may lead to significant diagnostic errors and misinterpretation of results.
Related Concept Videos
CNS Stimulants: Psychedelic Agents
Toxidromes: Clinical Features

