Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward Precision Cardiac Rehabilitation: Current Limitations and Future Opportunities of Omics and Artificial Intelligence.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

Automated Detection of Carotid Artery Stenosis Using a Sensitive Accelerometer Wearable Sensor and Interpretable Machine Learning.

Biosensors·2026
Same author

Social and Environmental Determinants of Stroke Functional Outcome and Strategies to Reduce Inequities: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Correction to: Early Recognition and Intervention for Poststroke Spasticity: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback for Reading Rehabilitation in Aphasia.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Specific Deficiency of Naïve CD4+ T Lymphocytes Characterizes Heart Failure and Heightens Mortality Risk in the HRS.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same journal

ENTF Neuromodulation Yields Reduced Disability After Stroke: An Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Menopause and Its Implications for Stroke in Women.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Physician Approaches to Determining Goals of Stroke Care for Patients Living With Disability or Dementia: Results from the SEED Mixed-Methods Study.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Aspirin for Stroke Primary Prevention: A Step Toward Genetic-Driven Personalized Medicine.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Cognition After Stroke: It Is a Long Story.

Stroke·2026
Same journal

Emerging Therapy Critique: Glibenclamide for Cerebral Edema-A Semi-CHARMed Treatment.

Stroke·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
05:28

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.1K

Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Extremity Recovery Following Stroke: A

Jayme S Knutson1,2, Amy S Friedl1, Kristine M Hansen1

  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J.S.K., A.S.F., K.M.H., M.Y.H., S.D.H., D.A.C., T.Z.H., J.C.), The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH.

Stroke
|November 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) improved upper extremity impairment and function more than other methods in stroke survivors. However, CCFES did not enhance hand dexterity compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES) or task-oriented training (TOT).

Keywords:
electric stimulationparesisstroke rehabilitationtherapeuticsupper extremity

More Related Videos

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.5K
The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
14:56

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Published on: September 23, 2018

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
05:28

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.1K
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.5K
The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
14:56

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Published on: September 23, 2018

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Stroke survivors often experience chronic hand hemiparesis, impacting daily function.
  • Current rehabilitation strategies include task-oriented training (TOT) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES).
  • Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) offers a novel approach by using the unaffected limb to control stimulation of the affected limb.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of CCFES against cyclic NMES (cNMES) and standard TOT for improving hand function in chronic stroke survivors.
  • To evaluate the impact of these interventions on upper extremity impairment, dexterity, and functional recovery.

Main Methods:

  • An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial involving 132 individuals 6-24 months post-stroke with moderate-to-severe hand weakness.
  • Participants were randomized to CCFES, cNMES, or TOT, receiving 10 home-based and 22 laboratory-based treatment sessions weekly for 12 weeks.
  • Primary outcome: change in Box and Blocks Test score at 6 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes: Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test, and responder rates.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were found in the Box and Blocks Test scores between the groups at 6 months.
  • CCFES demonstrated significant improvements in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer scores compared to cNMES and TOT (p<0.05).
  • CCFES also showed significant improvements in Action Research Arm Test scores compared to TOT (p<0.01) and higher responder rates for Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer improvement.

Conclusions:

  • CCFES did not significantly improve hand dexterity compared to cNMES or TOT.
  • CCFES effectively reduced upper extremity impairment and improved upper limb function compared to cNMES and TOT.
  • CCFES shows promise as an effective intervention for specific aspects of motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors.