Relating character to conduct violations at US service academies
Dustin Wood1, Leonard M Giambra2, Kevin Mullaney3
1Leadership Ethics and Law Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.
Summary
Character traits predict misconduct in military cadets. Specific Values in Action (VIA) scales like Self-Regulation and Prudence correlated with fewer offenses, while Social Intelligence and Creativity predicted more, highlighting key character development areas.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Military Leadership Studies
- Character Development
Background:
- Military service academies prioritize developing "leaders of character."
- Institutional systems identify and penalize misconduct to uphold this mission.
- Understanding character attributes is crucial for predicting and mitigating cadet misconduct.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the Values in Action (VIA) instrument predicts conduct offenses among cadets.
- To identify specific character dimensions associated with misconduct at service academies.
- To assess the predictive power of individual VIA items versus broader scales.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an early version of the Values in Action (VIA) instrument administered to cadets.
- Collected data on cumulative conduct offenses recorded during academy attendance.
- Employed correlational analysis to link VIA dimensions and individual items with misconduct records.
Main Results:
- Self-Regulation, Modesty/Humility, and Prudence scales predicted fewer conduct offenses.
- Social Intelligence, Originality/Creativity, and Humor/Playfulness scales predicted more conduct offenses.
- Individual VIA items offered significantly improved prediction of conduct offenses compared to broader scales.
Conclusions:
- A consistent profile of character attributes predicts misconduct across military service academies.
- Specific character strengths and weaknesses can be identified as risk factors for misconduct.
- Findings may inform character development programs and misconduct prevention strategies in similar contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
465
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
465
Cognitive Dissonance
36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
24.5K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.5K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
7.2K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.2K
Obedience
35.2K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.2K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
470
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
470


