Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Pathologist-Artificial Intelligence Concordance in HER2 Interpretation for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer:
Hyunchul Kim1, Jinhyung Heo2, Soo Ick Cho3
1Department of Pathology, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. HER2 is overexpressed in a subset of BTC patients, and recent advances in HER2-targeted agents are expanding therapeutic options. However, accurately assessing HER2 expression is challenging in BTC, especially at low levels. This study compared HER2 interpretations in advanced BTC by pathologists (H.K., J.H., and G.K.) using light microscopy (LM) and digital pathology (DP) and evaluated the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered pathology in enhancing HER2-scoring consistency. A total of 309 HER2 immunohistochemistry slides were obtained from advanced BTC patients who received systemic therapy at the CHA Bundang Medical Center between 2019 and 2022. Three pathologists independently evaluated HER2 expression twice, once using LM and once using DP, with a washout period between evaluations. An AI-powered whole slide image analyzer evaluated HER2 expression. The ground truth was selected based on consensus among pathologists. Pathologists showed complete agreement on HER2 results in 62.1% of LM evaluations and 63.4% of DP evaluations. For intraobserver variability, the weighted kappa values ranged from 0.979 to 0.984, whereas interobserver variability ranged from 0.819 to 0.863 for LM and 0.820 to 0.876 for DP. The overall concordance rate of HER2 categories between the AI and the ground truth was 83.5%. Clinical factors such as HER2 expression level and specimen type significantly influenced intraobserver and interobserver variability, whereas histologic grade was a key factor affecting the AI model's performance. In this study, we quantified intraobserver and interobserver variability in HER2 evaluation for BTC by pathologists and demonstrated that AI-powered HER2 scoring showed high concordance with pathologists' evaluations. Because the clinical factors underlying the discrepancies in the results from the AI model and pathologists were different, the AI model is expected to help pathologists make more objective assessments of BTC HER2 readings in the future.
More Related Videos
08:05Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
Published on: June 10, 2025
07:32Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024