Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Nonreciprocally coupled spin glasses: Exceptional-point-mediated phase transitions and aging
Giulia Garcia Lorenzana1,2, Ada Altieri2, Giulio Biroli1
1Laboratoire de Physique de l'École normale supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, F-75005 Paris, France.
Abstract:
Disordered systems can exhibit a dramatic slowdown of their dynamics called aging. Contrary to the established understanding that this phenomenon is destroyed by nonreciprocal interactions, we here show that the outcome crucially depends on the structure of the system. Unlike previous studies, which focused on random nonsymmetric interactions between simple microscopic components, we investigate a scenario where nonreciprocally coupled agents are macroscopic entities with complex internal dynamics, modeled as two identical spin glasses. This framework could be relevant for many biological systems, in which nonreciprocal interactions can arise at a coarse-grained level. Our dynamical mean-field theory calculations reveal a finite temperature transition from a static disordered phase to a non-time-translationally-invariant regime. Below this transition, mediated by a spectral singularity known as exceptional points, we find macroscopic oscillations superimposed on aging behavior. Asymptotically, the system rotates in the plane spanned by the two lowest energy modes of the uncoupled system. We contrast these results to the case of random nonreciprocity, where aging is suppressed at any finite temperature, and propose that the two cases correspond to two broader classes of systems, with "microscopic" versus "macroscopic" nonreciprocity, with aging surviving only in the second case.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing
Phase Transitions
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

