Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Clinical Outcome of the Oblique Locking Hip Screw
Shota Nakagawa1, Masato Toyonaga1, Takeshi Sawaguchi1,2
1Trauma and Reconstruction Center, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan, shinyuri-hospital.com.
Purpose:
To evaluate the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of the newly developed Oblique Locking Hip Screw (OLHS) compared with those of the commonly used cephalomedullary nail (CMN) in trochanteric femoral fracture treatment in older patients.
Methods:
This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with trochanteric fractures. Overall, 129 patients were analyzed: 64 treated with OLHS and 65 with CMN. Patient demographic data, fracture classification, surgical parameters (e.g., operating time and intraoperative blood loss), and clinical outcomes were assessed. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using radiographic findings and statistical analyses, including Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results:
The study included 57 patients in both the OLHS and CMN groups with 3 months of radiographic follow-up data. OLHS was more commonly used for stable AO A1 fractures, whereas CMN was preferred for unstable A2 fractures. Postoperative telescoping was greater with OLHS than with CMN (4.8 ± 4.3 vs. 3.0 ± 4.7 mm; p = 0.0028; mean difference 1.8 mm, 95% CI 0.15-3.45). Mortality, union, and adverse events were similar; two CMN patients had nonunion, with one conversion to total hip arthroplasty.
Conclusion:
OLHS provides satisfactory clinical outcomes for trochanteric fractures in this exploratory study, with preliminary evidence of adequate stability. Further randomized controlled trials or matched comparative studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
