Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
Published on: March 27, 2012
Longitudinal Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Accommodation in Young Children
Kristen L Kerber1, Deepa Dhungel1, Karen Flores1
1New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Purpose:
To evaluate longitudinal (3 years) accommodation responses (ARs) in children at high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) for myopia, including a subgroup of children who developed myopia.
Methods:
Accommodation was measured in young children (n = 92; 7.54 ± 0.97 years) with functional emmetropia (+0.97 ± 0.54 D) at baseline under static and dynamic conditions using an open-field autorefractor. Linear mixed models assessed group differences and the predictor role of accommodation on myopia onset.
Results:
At baseline and all visits (7 total), the LR group showed greater static AR (P < 0.01) and dynamic amplitude (P < 0.01); these effects remained after adjusting for age (AR P = 0.02; amplitude P = 0.01). After further adjusting for refractive error (spherical equivalent of cycloplegic refraction [M]), risk group differences were no longer significant. Logistic regression indicated AR was a significant predictor of myopia onset when age was included (P < 0.01), but not after accounting for M (P = 0.39), reflecting M's stronger influence. Accommodation was primarily associated with age and M in this cohort with homogeneous ages and M. A Sobel test (P = 0.06) suggested a possible mediating effect for AR on myopia development.
Conclusions:
A lower AR was associated with a greater myopia risk, but its effect appears secondary to refractive error. Similar patterns were observed for dynamic amplitude. Longitudinal evaluations were minimal, suggesting group differences likely emerged before clinical myopia onset.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Indeterminate Structure
Longitudinal Studies
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Schemata...

