Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

1.6K
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
1.6K
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

1.0K
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
1.0K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.8K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reflections on Visualizing the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Public.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2026
Same author

Towards adaptive bioelectronic wound therapy with integrated real-time diagnostics and machine learning-driven closed-loop control.

npj biomedical innovations·2026
Same author

Do You "Trust" This Visualization? An Inventory to Measure Trust in Visualizations.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML Models.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Tell Me Without Telling Me: Two-Way Prediction of Visualization Literacy and Visual Attention.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

An Analysis of Text Functions in Information Visualization.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same journal

MesoSplats: Texture Synthesis with Gaussian Splatting.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

GLLA: A Unified Force-Directed Graph Layout Framework Supporting Local Adjustments.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Multi-Perception Crowd: Learning to combine entity and implicit perception for diverse crowd simulation.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Hiding in Plain Sight: Camouflaging Real-world Objects.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

RTF2Mesh: Restricted Tangent Face Based Mesh Compression With Neural Displacement Fields.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Practical Occluder Generation for Mobile Games.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.6K

Write, Rank, or Rate: Comparing Methods for Studying Visualization Affordances.

Chase Stokes, Kylie Lin, Cindy Xiong Bearfield

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
    |November 20, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Researchers explored scalable methods to understand how visualization design affects reader interpretation. Combinations of ranking and rating techniques offer a viable alternative to labor-intensive studies for assessing chart affordances.

    More Related Videos

    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
    07:09

    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

    Published on: May 2, 2019

    6.5K
    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
    06:54

    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

    Published on: June 21, 2019

    6.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

    Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
    07:05

    Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

    Published on: October 27, 2016

    9.6K
    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
    07:09

    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

    Published on: May 2, 2019

    6.5K
    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
    06:54

    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

    Published on: June 21, 2019

    6.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Data Visualization
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Cognitive Psychology

    Background:

    • Understanding how specific design choices in information visualizations influence reader interpretation is crucial.
    • Traditional methods for analyzing visualization affordances often rely on labor-intensive, crowdsourced studies generating extensive free-response data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore and compare scalable research methodologies for assessing visualization affordances.
    • To evaluate the effectiveness of different elicitation methods in capturing reader interpretations of various chart types.

    Main Methods:

    • Tested four human-subject study methods: free response, visualization ranking, conclusion ranking, and salience rating.
    • Compared these methods' ability to elicit interpretations for line charts, dot plots, and heatmaps.
    • Investigated the use of GPT-4o as a large language model (LLM) proxy for human participants.

    Main Results:

    • No single method fully replicated free-response conclusions, but combined ranking and rating methods served as effective broad-scale proxies.
    • Ranking methods showed bias towards specific chart types and presented conclusions.
    • Salience rating did not capture nuanced variations between chart types.
    • GPT-4o performed best as a proxy for salience rating but had limitations in other areas.

    Conclusions:

    • Combinations of elicitation methods can provide scalable insights into visualization affordances.
    • Participant and model biases need careful consideration when selecting methodologies.
    • The choice and combination of methods, including LLMs, significantly impact the observed visualization affordances and require careful evaluation of trade-offs.