Prognostic comparison of improved versus preserved left ventricular systolic function following atrial fibrillation
Miwa Kanai1, Kyoichiro Yazaki1, Koichiro Ejima2
1Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
Patients with improved systolic function after atrial fibrillation ablation have similar outcomes to those with preserved function. This finding suggests comparable prognoses for heart failure patients in both groups post-ablation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) patients with improved systolic function post-atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation may have better outcomes.
- The prognostic value of this improvement compared to preserved systolic function is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prognosis of HF patients with improved ejection fraction (EF) after AF ablation to those with preserved EF.
- To evaluate the impact of AF ablation on systolic function in HF patients.
Main Methods:
- 1538 patients undergoing AF ablation were analyzed; 272 with systolic dysfunction and 293 with high likelihood of HF with preserved EF (pEF).
- Systolic dysfunction group was divided into improved EF (imp-EF, LVEF ≥50%) and non-improved EF (non-imp-EF, LVEF <50%) post-ablation.
- Primary endpoint: composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Propensity-score matching was used for comparison between imp-EF and pEF groups.
Main Results:
- After matching, the imp-EF group showed a comparable risk of the primary endpoint to the pEF group (HR 0.40, p=0.09).
- Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence rates were similar between groups (HR 0.70, p=0.26).
- In the imp-EF group, ATA recurrence predicted adverse events, while in the pEF group, E-wave velocity was the sole univariate predictor.
Conclusions:
- Heart failure patients with improved EF post-AF ablation and those with preserved EF have similar long-term prognoses.
- Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence is a significant factor for adverse events in patients with improved EF post-ablation.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) patients who exhibit improvement in systolic function following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation may experience better outcomes than those who do not. However, the prognostic significance of such improvement compared to originally preserved systolic function remains unclear.
Methods:
Among 1538 patients undergoing AF ablation, those meeting HF criteria were included. Patients with systolic dysfunction (n = 272) and those with a high likelihood of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5; pEF group, n = 293) were analyzed. The former were further subdivided based on post-procedural left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into improved EF (imp-EF, LVEF ≥50 %) and non-improved EF (non-imp-EF, LVEF <50 %) groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, comparing the imp-EF and pEF groups.
Results:
Among 272 patients with systolic dysfunction, 127 were categorized as imp-EF. After propensity-score matching (101 per group), the imp-EF group had comparable risk of the primary endpoint as the pEF group [HR 0.40 (0.13-1.16), p = 0.09] and similar atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence rates [HR 0.70 (0.37-1.30), p = 0.26] over a median follow-up of 41 (24-71) months. ATA recurrence after the last procedure was associated with adverse events in the imp-EF group, whereas E-wave velocity was the only predictor in the pEF group in univariate analysis.
Conclusions:
Patients in both the imp-EF and pEF groups demonstrated comparable prognoses.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
