Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
Deep learning [18F]-FDG-PET/CT‑based algorithm for tumor burden estimation in metastatic melanoma patients under
Lorenzo Lo Faro1,2, Hubert S Gabryś1, Simon Burgermeister1
1Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
The PET-Assisted Reporting System (PARS) shows potential for estimating tumor burden in metastatic melanoma patients but requires further refinement due to variable accuracy in lesion detection and overall tumor burden estimation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiation oncology are expanding, yet tumor burden estimation using AI remains under-explored.
- Deep learning models offer potential for improving diagnostic accuracy in cancer imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of a deep learning model, PET-Assisted Reporting System (PARS), for lesion detection, segmentation, and tumor burden estimation.
- To assess the utility of [18F]-FDG-PET/CT-based AI in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing immunotherapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 165 stage IV melanoma patients who underwent [18F]-FDG-PET/CT before immunotherapy.
- Comparison of gross tumor volumes segmented by PARS with manual delineations by radiation oncologists.
- Assessment of lesion detection metrics (precision, recall), individual lesion volume agreement, and overall tumor burden estimation accuracy.
Main Results:
- PARS achieved a recall of 68.9% but a modest precision of 46.8%, with performance varying by lesion location (e.g., lung vs. bone).
- PARS tended to underestimate individual lesion volumes (median relative difference -34.3%) with good agreement (ICC=0.77).
- Overall tumor burden was overestimated globally (28.3%), but patient-level estimation showed underestimation (median -18.4%) with high variability and poor agreement (ICC=0.28).
Conclusions:
- The PARS AI model demonstrates moderate accuracy for lesion detection and volume estimation, suggesting potential for treatment decision support.
- Significant variability in tumor burden estimation necessitates further model development for reliable clinical adoption in metastatic melanoma management.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017