Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Z-DEA-FMEA: identifying effective strategies for optimizing the HIV drugs supply chain using multi-criteria
Amirkeyvan Ghazvinian1, Bo Feng2, Junwen Feng1
1School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Introduction:
Millions of people living with HIV around the world depend on having access to antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, yet the supply chain continues to confront obstacles like rising freight costs and delivery delays. These inefficiencies put timely access to life-saving medications at risk, especially in resource-limited settings. To find ways to improve the HIV drug supply chain, this study looks into the underlying causes of these disruptions.
Objectives:
This study aims to: (1) assess and prioritize risks in the HIV drug supply chain, focusing on failure modes impacting delivery timelines and freight costs; and (2) enhance supply chain substantivity (fulfillment capacity) and resilience (disruption adaptability) through evidence-based strategies.
Methods:
Using Z-numbers to handle uncertainty, we developed a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework that integrates Z-SWARA, Z-WASPAS, and Z-DEA-FMEA. Along with using FMEA to assess risks and identify failure modes, the method ranks them based on freight costs and delivery timeliness, using hybrid rankings, RPN, Z-SWARA/Z-WASPAS, and Z-DEA-FMEA efficiencies.
Results:
Hybrid rankings indicate that the primary contributors to supply chain inefficiencies are Quantity Errors (F14, ranked 1st, ππ‘ππ‘ππ=0.9374), Pack Price Discrepancies (F16, ranked 2nd, 0.8430), and Unit Miscalculation (F13, ranked 3rd, 0.7261). The Z-WASPAS analysis emphasizes the financial implications of F16, placing it at the top for Freight Costs (Kβ―=β―0.178). Additionally, Z-DEA-FMEA notes efficiency shifts including Delivery Confirmation (F06, π=0.7303, Delivery). In the case of Weight Failures (F20), the Freight score (ππ=0.6991, ranked 3rd) surpasses that of Delivery (0.6753, ranked 4th), while Shipment Mode Selection (F04) holds the 5th position overall (ππ‘ππ‘ππ=0.6741).
Discussion:
Aiming to improve the availability of antiretroviral (ARV) medications, our approach integrates risk, uncertainty, and efficiency analysis to formulate evidence-based strategies by utilizing Z-numbers. It redefines concepts of resilience and substantivity, providing decision-makers with a framework to enhance delivery speed and minimize costs. These improvements strengthen global health logistics.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Miscellaneous Factors
Age plays a significant role due to differences in body composition among different age groups. Infants, for instance, have a higher proportion of total body water and lower albumin levels, a protein that binds drugs in the bloodstream. This unique composition in infants enhances the...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

