Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

09:24
A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
Published on: January 28, 2020
9.3K
Direct Versus Indirect Submaximal VO2max Assessment in Masters Basketball Players
Kristine Dakule1, Una Veseta2,3,4,5, Voldemars Arnis2,3
1Master's Programme in Sports Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Latvia, 1 Jelgavas Street, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
|November 24, 2025
Summary
Two submaximal tests, Åstrand-Ryhming and YMCA, accurately estimate maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in masters basketball players. These tests offer practical alternatives to cardiopulmonary exercise testing for monitoring aerobic fitness in older athletes.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Exercise Physiology
- Gerontology
Background:
- Accurate aerobic capacity assessment is crucial for performance monitoring in masters athletes, especially in team sports.
- Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is a key indicator of aerobic fitness.
- Masters athletes represent a growing and distinct population requiring specific fitness assessment considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity and agreement of three indirect VO2max protocols against cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in masters basketball players.
- To compare the Åstrand-Ryhming, YMCA, and Polar OwnIndex Fitness tests for estimating VO2max.
- To determine the most suitable indirect method for assessing aerobic capacity in this demographic.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 50 male masters basketball players (aged 51-81 years).
- Direct VO2max measurement using CPET served as the gold standard.
- Indirect VO2max estimation via Åstrand-Ryhming, YMCA, and Polar OwnIndex tests, with statistical analysis of validity and agreement (correlation, error metrics, Bland-Altman plots).
Main Results:
- The Åstrand-Ryhming and YMCA tests demonstrated acceptable validity and agreement with CPET, showing low systematic error (<4%) and mean absolute error (≈17-18%).
- Pearson correlations (r) for Åstrand-Ryhming and YMCA were above 0.50, with the Åstrand-Ryhming test at low workload showing the strongest correlation (r=0.75).
- The Polar OwnIndex test significantly overestimated VO2max, with a mean error of ≈30% and MAE of 32%.
Conclusions:
- The Åstrand-Ryhming and YMCA submaximal tests are valid and practical alternatives to CPET for estimating VO2max in masters basketball players.
- The Polar OwnIndex test is not recommended for this population due to significant overestimation and poor agreement.
- Submaximal cycling protocols can effectively support fitness monitoring and training prescription for older athletes.
Keywords:
CPETVO2maxaerobic capacitybasketballcardiopulmonary exercise testindirect fitness testingmasters athletes
