Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Clinical Pathways in Atrial Fibrillation: A Framework Aligned with the
Emma Sokolova1,2,3, Olav Goetz4, Ketija Grīnberga1,2
1Department of Internal Diseases, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Integrating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into atrial fibrillation (AF) care requires a system-level redesign. The proposed framework guides how PROMs can improve clinical decisions and patient outcomes in AF management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
- Patient-Centered Care
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) presents significant clinical and financial burdens globally.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for patient-centered care but are underutilized in AF management.
- Limited integration of PROMs hinders comprehensive AF care pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a policy-oriented framework for integrating PROMs into AF management.
- To build upon Quality of Life (QoL) assessment and the AF-CARE pathway for enhanced integration.
- To align PROM integration with clinical decision-making and value-based healthcare strategies.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of selected PROMs (AFEQT, SF-36, EQ-5D, AFSS) to assess QoL domain representation.
- Analysis of how uncaptured domains relate to routine care and healthcare delivery.
- Construction of a conceptual framework linking PROM domains to clinical, policy, and follow-up strategies in AF.
Main Results:
- Existing PROMs adequately capture symptom burden but miss key domains like cognition, sleep, sexual health, and economic impact.
- The proposed framework integrates PROMs into AF-CARE components for routine monitoring and improved decision-making.
- The framework supports value-based healthcare strategies and outlines practical implementation for everyday care and health system decisions.
Conclusions:
- Effective integration of PROMs into AF-CARE necessitates a system-level redesign, not just isolated tool implementation.
- The developed framework shifts the focus from *if* PROMs should be used to *how* they can best influence clinical decisions and patient outcomes in AF.
- This approach aims to meaningfully enhance patient care and outcomes within the AF management pathway.
More Related Videos
03:47Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Patient-centered Care
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care