Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erectile and ejaculatory outcomes after penile fracture repair: a comparative analysis of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures.

International journal of impotence research·2026
Same author

Prediction of intensive care unit requirement and in-hospital mortality in Fournier's gangrene: a comparative analysis of conventional statistical and machine learning models.

Updates in surgery·2026
Same author

Patient-reported penile sensory loss, not surgical approach, is associated with sexual satisfaction after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

A rare complication following excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty: Osteomyelitis: a case report.

Medicine·2026
Same author

Pelvic Lymph Node Staging With PSMA PET in Prostate Cancer: Surgical Validation With Implications for Radiotherapy Planning.

The Prostate·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Lymph Node Invasion Prediction in Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Machine Learning Study.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Clinical Impact and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

ASO Author Reflections: The Hidden Cost of Gastric Preservation During Cytoreductive Surgery for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: Understanding the Functional Consequences of Extensive Perigastric Cytoreduction.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Survival of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Versus Adenocarcinoma in Resected Stage I-III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

ASO Visual Abstract: Quality, Reliability, and Viewer Engagement of YouTube Videos on Esophageal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

ASO Visual Abstract: Implementing Paradigm-Shifting Clinical Trials: Real-World Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma Patients.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Trends in Breast and Axillary Operations in Young Patients with Operable Breast Cancer from the National Cancer Database (NCDB): De-escalation of Axillary Surgery and Increased Use of Radiation.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

468

Lymph Node Invasion Prediction in Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Machine-Learning Study.

Osman Can1, Özgün Yücel2, Yiğit Can Filtekin3

  • 1Urology Department, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Başakşehir Neighborhood, G-434 Street, No: 2L, 34480, Başakşehir, Istanbul, Türkiye. dr.osmancan01@gmail.com.

Annals of Surgical Oncology
|November 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models accurately predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer, outperforming traditional nomograms. These models, especially Random Forest, improve surgical decision-making by better identifying LNI risk.

Keywords:
BrigantiMSKCCMachine learningPartinProstate cancerRandom Forest

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.3K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

468
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.3K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer is crucial for surgical planning.
  • Existing nomograms struggle to balance the risks of missing LNI and unnecessary lymph node dissections.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers enhanced predictive capabilities for complex clinical data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate ML models for predicting LNI in prostate cancer.
  • To compare the performance of ML models against traditional nomograms.
  • To enhance model interpretability using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Main Methods:

  • Developed ML models using clinicopathologic features to predict LNI.
  • Applied Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance.
  • Trained and evaluated four ML algorithms (k-NN, Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost) using 10-fold cross-validation.
  • Assessed performance via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC; utilized SHAP for interpretability.

Main Results:

  • The Random Forest model exhibited the highest predictive performance.
  • Key predictors included PSA density, clinical stage, and cribriform pattern.
  • SHAP analysis provided visualization of feature contributions.
  • Random Forest and XGBoost demonstrated superior discrimination compared to existing nomograms.

Conclusions:

  • ML models show potential to surpass traditional nomograms in predicting prostate cancer LNI.
  • Dataset balancing and explainability tools like SHAP are vital for ML model efficacy.
  • External validation and incorporating additional features can improve model generalizability.