Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP02:36

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP

12.1K
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, or ChIP, is an antibody-based technique used to identify sites on DNA that bind to transcription factors of interest or histone proteins. It also helps determine the type of histone modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, or methylation.
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
12.1K
Heterochromatin02:38

Heterochromatin

17.8K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions that take up more dye are called heterochromatin. Heterochromatin is further classified into two forms – constitutive heterochromatin and facultative heterochromatin.
Constitutive heterochromatin: It is a highly compact region of chromatin that is mostly concentrated in the centromere and telomere. Unlike euchromatin, the amino acid at...
17.8K
Euchromatin01:01

Euchromatin

8.8K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions take up more dye, appearing darker, while the less-compact areas take up less dye and appear lighter. Based on the compaction level, chromatins are classified into two primary forms – euchromatin and heterochromatin.
Euchromatin is the less dense region of the chromatin and stains lighter. Euchromatin contains histone H3 extensively...
8.8K
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications02:25

Spreading of Chromatin Modifications

9.3K
The histone proteins in the nucleosomes are post-translationally modified (PTM) to increase or decrease access to DNA. The commonly observed PTMs are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination of lysine amino acids in the histone H3 tail region. These histone modifications have specific meaning for the cell. Hence, they are called "histone code". The protein complex involved in histone modification is termed as "reader-writer" complex.
Writers
The writer...
9.3K
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression02:35

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

24.6K
Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences  access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area. 
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
24.6K
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

7.0K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fine-mapping candidate neuropsychiatric regulatory variants using cell type-aware comparative genomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Challenges in predicting chromatin accessibility differences between species.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

RERconverge Update: Runtime Reduction and Analysis Function Overhaul.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Local control of dopamine release in nucleus accumbens gates opioid withdrawal aversion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Morphoelectric Diversity and Specialization of Neuronal Cell Types in the Primate Striatum.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Cross-Species Enhancer-AAV Toolkit for Cell Type-Specific Targeting Across the Basal Ganglia.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Layered social competition coordinates reproductive hierarchy formation in ants.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Combination epigenetic-targeted therapy increases the immunogenicity of poorly immunogenic sarcomas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Loss of LanC-like proteins delays post-injury regeneration of aging skeletal muscles.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Integrative Transfer Network: Deep Transfer Learning Across Populations and Prediction Targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Confidence-supported label-free metabolic imaging with FPhaS phase autofluorescence microscopy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Sequence-encoded autoinhibition couples mRNA decapping activity to phase separation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Mapping Genome-wide Accessible Chromatin in Primary Human T Lymphocytes by ATAC-Seq
09:08

Mapping Genome-wide Accessible Chromatin in Primary Human T Lymphocytes by ATAC-Seq

Published on: November 13, 2017

18.5K

Challenges in Predicting Chromatin Accessibility Differences between Species.

Amy Stephen1,2,3, Arian Raje2,4,5, Heather H Sestili2

  • 1Mathematical Sciences Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|November 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict enhancer activity, but struggle with quantitative differences across species. Training on multiple species improves generalization but not cross-species prediction accuracy for chromatin accessibility.

More Related Videos

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells
08:08

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 2, 2018

11.8K
Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis
09:26

Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Mapping Genome-wide Accessible Chromatin in Primary Human T Lymphocytes by ATAC-Seq
09:08

Mapping Genome-wide Accessible Chromatin in Primary Human T Lymphocytes by ATAC-Seq

Published on: November 13, 2017

18.5K
Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells
08:08

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 2, 2018

11.8K
Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis
09:26

Chromatin Extraction from Frozen Chimeric Liver Tissue for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Enhancers are key transcriptional regulatory elements driving phenotypic diversity.
  • Rapid sequence evolution of enhancers despite functional conservation complicates cross-species functional prediction.
  • Machine learning models for enhancer activity prediction have not been rigorously tested for cross-species quantitative differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ability of machine learning models to predict quantitative differences in enhancer activity across orthologous regions in different species.
  • To develop and apply a framework for assessing cross-species performance of enhancer activity prediction models.
  • To investigate the impact of multi-species training data on model generalization and cross-species prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained on a regression task to predict chromatin accessibility (a proxy for enhancer activity) in the liver across five mammalian species.
  • A novel framework was developed to evaluate the cross-species predictive performance of these CNN models.
  • Model performance was assessed for both intra-species and inter-species prediction of chromatin accessibility differences.

Main Results:

  • Training CNNs on multiple mammalian species improved model generalization to both training and held-out species.
  • Models consistently demonstrated poor performance in predicting quantitative differences in chromatin accessibility between orthologous regions across species.
  • Cross-species prediction accuracy for chromatin accessibility differences remained a significant challenge despite improvements in overall model generalization.

Conclusions:

  • Multi-species training enhances the generalization of enhancer activity prediction models but does not fully resolve the challenge of predicting quantitative differences across species.
  • Predicting evolutionary changes in enhancer activity and chromatin accessibility between species using current machine learning regression models remains difficult.
  • Further development of computational frameworks is needed to accurately model the functional divergence of regulatory elements across evolutionary timescales.