Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
Published on: November 3, 2016
Concurrent Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised in a Neonatal Surgical
Cathryn Crowle1,2, Michelle Jackman3,4, Carly Luke5
1Grace Centre for Neonatal Intensive Care, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
The Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) showed weak concurrent validity with other infant assessments but demonstrated good inter-rater reliability for categorizing motor optimality and predicting adverse outcomes in infants post-neonatal surgery.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Neonatal Care
Background:
- Infants undergoing major neonatal surgery require careful neurodevelopmental monitoring.
- The Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) is a tool used to assess motor development.
- Evaluating the MOS-R's validity and reliability in this high-risk population is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the concurrent validity of the MOS-R against established developmental scales (Bayley III, HINE) in infants post-neonatal surgery.
- To determine the inter-rater reliability and agreement of the MOS-R in this cohort.
- To evaluate the MOS-R's utility in identifying potential adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study included 211 term infants with congenital anomalies requiring neonatal surgery.
- Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing MOS-R scores with Bayley III and HINE at 3 months corrected age.
- Inter-rater reliability and agreement were quantified using Gwet's AC1, ICC, and percentage agreement.
Main Results:
- The MOS-R demonstrated very weak correlations with Bayley III (cognition, expressive communication, gross motor) and HINE total scores.
- Categorizing the MOS-R based on optimality showed associations primarily with gross motor function.
- Inter-rater reliability for the total MOS-R was substantial (AC1 = 0.72), with good agreement for optimality categories (AC1 = 0.76) and excellent agreement for a predictive cut-off score (AC1 = 1.00).
Conclusions:
- The MOS-R exhibits limited concurrent validity with the Bayley III and HINE at 3 months corrected age in infants post-neonatal surgery.
- Despite limited concurrent validity, the MOS-R demonstrates strong inter-rater reliability, particularly when used with a predictive cut-off score for adverse outcomes.
- The MOS-R provides valuable clinical insights and reliable categorization of motor optimality in this vulnerable infant population.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
19:15Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014