Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left ventricular ejection fraction response after atrial fibrillation ablation: Clinical predictors and development
Sayed Al-Aidarous1, Saffron Rajappan2, Nikhil Ahluwalia3
1Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Background:
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) improves outcomes, yet left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) response is difficult to prospectively predict.
Objective:
This study aimed to identify preprocedural predictors of LVEF response after AF ablation in patients with LVSD and develop a pragmatic score to stratify patients.
Methods:
This multicenter cohort study included patients with AF and an LVEF of <50% undergoing index ablation. The primary endpoint was responder status defined as ≥10% increase in LVEF or improvement to ≥50% on follow-up echocardiography after the final ablation. Multivariable logistic regression modeling, stratified by follow-up rhythm, was used to identify predictors and derive a simplified scoring tool.
Results:
Among 366 patients (aged 64.4 ± 10.6 years; 82% male), 70.8% were left ventricular responders at follow-up. Predictors of nonresponse in the sinus rhythm subgroup included heart failure etiology, QRS duration of >105 ms, paroxysmal AF, and type 2 diabetes. These were incorporated into the PACED score, which stratified response (score <2, 87% probability of response; score ≥3, 71% of nonresponse) with good discrimination (c-statistic 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.89). In the largest contemporary multicenter cardiac magnetic resonance subcohort, late gadolinium enhancement was more frequent among nonresponders (84.6% vs 53.6%; P < .001). Guideline-directed medical therapy at baseline was not independently associated with recovery.
Conclusion:
LVEF response post-AF ablation in patients with LVSD can be accurately predicted precatheter ablation with a bedside score. Left ventricular response depends primarily on substrate and conduction characteristics rather than pharmacotherapy in a guideline-directed medical therapy-optimized cohort. Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance is associated with an increased chance of being a nonresponder to ablation.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

