Genotype × environment interaction studies in monoecious and gynoecious bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.)
Durga Prasad Moharana1,2, D R Bhardwaj3, Kartik Pramanik4
1Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221 005, India. dpmoharana@ouat.ac.in.
Abstract:
Bitter gourd is an important cucurbitaceous crop grown in the summer and rainy seasons. However, its improvement requires genotypes with high yield and stability across the seasons. We evaluated 22 (gynoecious and monoecious) lines across four environments (spring-summer and rainy seasons over 2 years) for number of fruits per plant (NFP), fruit length (FL), fruit circumference (FC), fruit weight (FW), and yield per plant (YP), with the goal of determining the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) for yield and yield-contributing traits. Analysis of variance indicated a highly significant variation among the genotypes, environments, and GEI for all the traits under study. The environmental influence on yield accounted for 70.38% of the total variation. The presence of a strong environmental effect on complex traits such as yield indicates a substantial difference among different growing seasons. AMMI, WAASBY/ASV, and YSI all identified broadly stable genotypes; G3, G5, and G8 (notably high NFP), with G8 and G7 combining stability and high YP. Best performers included G16, G19, and G7 for FL; G9, G2, and G11 for FC; and G13, G16, and G21 for FW, with G12 expressing the most FW. GGE biplots identified two mega-environments; E2 and E3, which were the most discriminative for NFP and YP, respectively, with environment-specific "winners" allowing for targeted deployment. BLUPs and BLUEs were consistent across environments, with G20, G8, and G7 consistently leading in YP. The high-yield group (BLUP ≥ 1.79 kg: G14, G20, G9, G5, G6, G4, G8, G7) outperformed the grand mean. These findings support a need for a dual breeding strategy to advance broadly adapted, high-YP lines (G20, G8, G7, and G3, G5) for wide release and hybrid production, while exploiting specific adaptation for market-defining traits (FC and FW) using E2/E3 as primary selection sites. Integrating stability indices with BLUPs accelerates genetic gain and makes gynoecious lines more suitable for hybrid seed production.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Gene-Environment Interactions
Monohybrid Crosses
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
Multiple Allele Traits
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...


