Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Clinical coordination between primary-level physicians and referral-level specialists in Morocco: a cross-sectional
Rachid Moulki1,2,3, Zakaria Belrhiti4,5, Hanane Asri6,7
1Mohammed VI International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco. rmoulki@um6ss.ma.
Clinical coordination between primary level physicians and referral level specialists in Morocco is limited, impacting care continuity. Enhancing coordination requires improved feedback, digital tools, and formal recognition for primary care physicians.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Clinical Coordination
- Physician Collaboration
Background:
- Clinical coordination between primary level physicians (PLP) and referral level specialists (RLS) is vital for healthcare system overhauls, yet under-documented in North Africa.
- This study addresses the need to assess clinical coordination in Morocco's Casablanca-Settat region and identify key influencing factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the current state of clinical coordination between PLP and RLS in the Casablanca-Settat region.
- To identify sociodemographic, organizational, and interactional factors associated with physicians' perceptions of clinical coordination.
Main Methods:
- An analytical cross-sectional survey utilized the validated COORDENA-CAT questionnaire among 329 physicians (186 PLP, 143 RLS).
- Data collected included experiences of information-sharing, clinical-management coordination, and perceptions of overall coordination.
- Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with a high perception of coordination.
Main Results:
- Only 30.7% of physicians reported regular clinical information sharing, with limited therapeutic coherence (24.3% jointly defined care plans).
- Physician agreement on referral appropriateness was low (97.3% PLP vs. 59.4% RLS).
- Independent factors for high coordination perception included working at the referral level, personal ties, perceived mutual influence, and supportive institutional environments.
Conclusions:
- Clinical coordination is significantly limited, particularly for PLP, due to insufficient feedback, weak formal structures, and restricted specialist access.
- Priority strategies include strengthening local governance, implementing secure digital tools (EHR, tele-expertise), regular clinical meetings, and formalizing PLP roles as care coordinators.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Healthcare System
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Tertiary Healthcare System
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...

