Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

866
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
866
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

374
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
374
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

714
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
714

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural signatures of model-based and model-free reinforcement learning across prefrontal cortex and striatum.

eLife·2026
Same author

Octopamine and tyramine dynamics predict learning rate phenotypes during associative conditioning in honey bees.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Composing egocentric and allocentric maps for flexible navigation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Infinite hidden Markov models can dissect the complexities of learning.

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same author

A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression.

Psychological medicine·2025
Same author

Brain-wide representations of prior information in mouse decision-making.

Nature·2025
Same journal

Frequency-dependent modulation of foveal contrast sensitivity by fine-scale exogenously triggered attention.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Estimating probabilities of malaria importation in southern Mozambique through modelling <i>P. falciparum</i> genomics and mobility patterns.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Conformational variability of HIV-1 Env trimer and viral vulnerability.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Disinformation elicits learning biases.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Correction: Generation of a transparent killifish line through multiplex CRISPR/Cas9mediated gene inactivation.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Differential regulation of hepatic macrophage fate by Chi3l1 in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

eLife·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.4K

Individual differences in tail risk sensitive exploration using Bayes-adaptive Markov decision processes.

Tingke Shen1, Peter Dayan1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.

Elife
|December 1, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animals exhibit varying risk sensitivities when exploring novel environments. A new Bayes-adaptive model explains individual differences in exploration behavior based on risk aversion and threat expectations, potentially aiding in understanding anxiety disorders.

Keywords:
Bayesian reinforcement learningexplorationmouseneurosciencerisk sensitivity

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.4K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Exploration in novel environments presents a trade-off between resource discovery and predation risk.
  • Individual differences in risk sensitivity and prior expectations influence animal behavior.
  • Existing models struggle to capture the nuances of risk-sensitive exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational model explaining individual differences in risk-sensitive exploration behavior.
  • To integrate risk aversion and threat perception into an exploration framework.
  • To link behavioral patterns to underlying psychological traits.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a Bayes-adaptive Markov decision process model.
  • Incorporated an adaptive hazard function for predation risk.
  • Included an intrinsic reward function for exploration and a Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) objective for risk sensitivity.
  • Fitted the model to behavioral data from 26 animals exploring a novel object.

Main Results:

  • The model accurately captured quantitative (bout frequency/duration) and qualitative (approach styles) aspects of exploration.
  • Individual differences in exploration strategies were explained by model parameters.
  • Identified distinct behavioral profiles: risk-neutral (flexible priors) and risk-averse (inflexible priors).

Conclusions:

  • Bayes-adaptive modeling provides a framework for understanding risk-sensitive exploration.
  • Individual differences in exploration are linked to distinct risk-aversion and threat-prior profiles.
  • This approach may inform the study and treatment of psychiatric disorders like anxiety.