Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Multimodality assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a multicenter validation study
Christian Weber1, J Studier-Fischer2, H Reiss2
1Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. christian.weber@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Objectives:
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard modality for grading aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) allows direct aortic valve area (AVA) planimetry (AVATOE), while computed tomography angiography (CTA) offers a non-invasive alternative (AVACTA). This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between AVA measurements across modalities and to determine a diagnostic AVACTA threshold for severe AS.
Methods:
This retrospective study included a single-center derivation cohort of 176 patients (mean age 80.0 ± 7.7 years, 52.8% male) with moderate to severe AS who underwent full-cycle CTA, TTE, and TOE. AVACTA was measured by two independent raters. Correlation with AVATOE and other parameters was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to define an optimal AVACTA threshold for severe AS, which was validated in a multi-center cohort of 407 patients (mean age 80.9 ± 6.7 years, 52.8% male) with comparable characteristics.
Results:
Mean AVACTA was 0.96 ± 0.28 cm² with a high interrater reliability (IRR = 0.84), compared to a mean AVATOE of 0.88 ± 0.26 cm² (Pearson's r = 0.73). ROC analysis identified 0.96 cm² as the optimal AVACTA threshold for diagnosing severe AS (AUC = 0.846; sensitivity = 71.7%; specificity = 89.8%) compared to TOE grading. This threshold yielded good diagnostic performance in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.817; sensitivity = 78.2%; specificity = 72.6%).
Conclusions:
AVACTA demonstrated high reliability, showing a strong correlation with AVATOE. The 0.96 cm² threshold, defined in the derivation cohort, performed well in the validation cohort for assessing aortic stenosis severity.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

