Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Development of Sulfidogenic Sludge from Marine Sediments and Trichloroethylene Reduction in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor
Published on: October 15, 2015
Revealing the overlooking role of polysulfides in sulfide-based denitrification biofilms through mathematical
1National Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China; Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education), College of Environment and Ecology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; SPIC Yuanda Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401122, China.
Abstract:
Sulfide-based denitrification produces several intermediates, and the subsequent oxidation of elemental sulfur (S0)/polysulfides (Sn2-) is the rate-limiting step. However, the factors affecting S0/ Sn2- utilization in sulfide-based denitrification biofilms are not entirely clear. In this study, a one-dimensional (1-D) biofilm model was developed in AQUASIM, incorporating the kinetics of mass transfer and the four-step denitrification process. Experimental data obtained in a moving bed biofilm reactor were used to calibrate and validate the model. Simulations were performed with different diffusion coefficients of S0/ Sn2- and biofilm thicknesses, which were also compared with the simulation performed in an ideal mixed reactor. Modeling results show that the decrease in the diffusion coefficient of S0/ Sn2- leads to exacerbated S0/ Sn2- accumulation in the outer biofilms and reduced active biomass concentration. Polysulfides with better water solubility should be the actual electron donors in the biofilm system. The increase in biofilm thickness not only results in higher mass transfer resistance but also forms separated layers. Sulfide and Sn2- function as dual electron donors in the outer biofilm layer, while only Sn2- is available in the deeper layer. The difference in sulfide and Sn2- utilization rates further leads to the imbalanced electron consumption rates of four-step denitrification throughout the biofilm. Compared to the suspended system, the biofilm system is less effective in enhancing Sn2- utilization, but shows a kinetic advantage in Sn2- recovery. The findings of the study shed light on the role of Sn2- in sulfide-based denitrification biofilm systems and offer guidance for process optimization.
Related Concept Videos
Biofilms
Preparation and Reactions of Sulfides
Sulfur Assimilation
Metabolism of Chemolithotrophs

