Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
Published on: August 19, 2021
Consequences of Kramers-Kronig relations on Kleinman antisymmetric spectral observables: Chiral-specific sum
Matthew Tremblay1, Ty Santiago2, Kristian Olesen2
1Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Abstract:
Investigating water structures at aqueous interfaces has been a central focus in the field of nonlinear surface spectroscopy over decades. This large body of work leads to a conclusion that asymmetric OH stretches should be largely silent in sum frequency generation (SFG) spectra. Nonetheless, our recent studies show chiral-specific SFG response of water originating from the first hydration shell of proteins and DNA arising from a sum of equal-magnitude and opposite-phase symmetric and asymmetric OH stretches, resulting in an oppositely signed couplet. Motivated initially by this apparently inconsistent behavior for chiral-specific vs conventional (achiral) SFG, we demonstrate herein a fundamental argument for the appearance of the oppositely signed couplets in chiral-specific vibrational SFG. The interplay between two foundational optical relations, Kramers-Kronig relations and index-interchange symmetry arising in the adiabatic zero-frequency limit (often referred to as Kleinman symmetry), is shown to require the imaginary resonant contributions to the tensors describing chiral-specific SFG responses to collectively sum to zero. In brief, all indices within the surface susceptibility must become interchangeable in the degenerate, zero-frequency adiabatic limit. From Kramers-Kronig relations connecting the real and imaginary susceptibility, this asymptotic limit in the real susceptibility can only be met if the imaginary-valued resonant contributions over the relevant spectral range sum to zero. These symmetry constraints were found to agree with density functional theory calculations on small water clusters and with experimental and computational phase-resolved chiral-specific SFG spectra. These symmetry requirements provide constraints for analyzing phase-resolved chiral-specific SFG spectra for extracting structural information about chiral molecules at interfaces.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy: Organic Radicals
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

