Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

F Distribution01:19

F Distribution

8.8K
The F distribution was named after Sir Ronald Fisher, an English statistician. The F statistic is a ratio (a fraction) with two sets of degrees of freedom; one for the numerator and one for the denominator. The F distribution is derived from the Student's t distribution. The values of the F distribution are squares of the corresponding values of the t distribution. One-Way ANOVA expands the t test for comparing more than two groups. The scope of that derivation is beyond the level of this...
8.8K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.0K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

550
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
550
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

7.1K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
7.1K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

7.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
7.4K
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

8.1K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
8.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phylogenomics of the tetraploid Hawaiian lobeliads: Implications for their origin, dispersal history, and adaptive radiation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Leveraging graphical model techniques to study evolution on phylogenetic networks.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Anomalous networks under the multispecies coalescent: theory and prevalence.

Journal of mathematical biology·2024
Same author

Ecophysiological adaptations shape distributions of closely related trees along a climatic moisture gradient.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Summary Tests of Introgression Are Highly Sensitive to Rate Variation Across Lineages.

Systematic biology·2023
Same author

PhyloCoalSimulations: A Simulator for Network Multispecies Coalescent Models, Including a New Extension for the Inheritance of Gene Flow.

Systematic biology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

17.1K

Low accuracy of complex admixture graph inference from f-statistics.

Lauren E Frankel1,2, Cécile Ané3

  • 1Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.

Genetics
|December 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary

F-statistics accurately infer simple evolutionary networks but struggle with complex ones. The major tree structure is reliably recovered, but caution is advised when interpreting complex network details.

Keywords:
ABBA-BABAD-statisticgene flowhybridizationidentifiabilityintrogressionphylogenetic networkrate variationreticulation

More Related Videos

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
07:11

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis

Published on: August 19, 2021

2.9K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

17.1K
ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
07:11

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis

Published on: August 19, 2021

2.9K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Population genetics
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • F-statistics are widely used to analyze hybridization, admixture, and introgression among populations and evolutionary lineages.
  • Inferring complex evolutionary histories, especially those involving reticulate evolution, remains a significant challenge in phylogenetics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of f-statistics in inferring phylogenetic network structures under varying complexity.
  • To identify factors influencing the reliability of network inference using f-statistics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simulations to test the performance of f-statistics across a range of phylogenetic network complexities.
  • Assessed the impact of network characteristics such as cycle size, number of reticulations, and violation of the molecular clock on inference accuracy.

Main Results:

  • F-statistics accurately recovered network structures with a single reticulation or reticulations within large cycles (≥4 nodes).
  • Inference accuracy was poor for complex networks, particularly those with reticulations in small cycles (3 nodes), increased reticulation numbers, or higher network levels.
  • The major phylogenetic tree topology was consistently recovered reliably, irrespective of network complexity.
  • Violation of the molecular clock significantly reduced network inference accuracy and increased false rejections of reticulation events.

Conclusions:

  • Network complexity, specifically the presence of small cycles, is a critical factor limiting the accurate inference of reticulate evolution using f-statistics.
  • Identifiability issues likely underlie the differential recoverability of simple versus complex networks.
  • While the major tree component is reliably estimated, inferring detailed network structures, especially complex ones, requires careful consideration and validation.
  • Recommendations include evaluating multiple top-scoring networks and assessing rate variation within the studied system.