Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test SIT using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal RHE Model
Published on: July 13, 2009
Quantitative Risk Assessment of Diisocyanates Leaching From Wound Dressings Under Physiological Conditions
Ania Stras1,2, Sarah Mannaert3, Michaël Canfyn1
1Medicines and Health Products, Sciensano, Ixelles, Belgium.
Introduction:
Diisocyanates are potent sensitizers extensively used in polyurethane-based materials, with numerous case reports linking them to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Recent extractables studies have detected residual diisocyanates in medical devices such as wound dressings. However, these assessments typically rely on non-physiological extraction methods, limiting their relevance to actual skin exposure conditions.
Objectives:
This study aimed to develop and validate a physiologically relevant method for quantifying residual 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanates (MDI), dicyclohexylmethane-4,4-diisocyanates (DMDI), hexamethylene diisocyanates (HDI), toluene diisocyanates (2,4- and 2,6-TDI) and isophorone diisocyanates (IPDI) leaching from wound dressings, and subsequently assess their risk of sensitisation induction and ACD elicitation.
Methods:
Diisocyanate standards were stabilised as di-lysine adducts in an artificial sweat solution, simulating skin exposure. An optimised LC-MS/MS method was used for quantification. The method was validated across a wide concentration range and subsequently applied to 36 commercial wound dressings. Exposure levels were evaluated against toxicological thresholds for quantitative risk assessments.
Results:
The method proved reliable for all target diisocyanates (except IPDI) at concentrations ≥ 15 ppb. Analysis of the samples revealed that 44% contained quantifiable levels of residual diisocyanates. Notably, over 50% of the HDI-positive and 20% of MDI-positive samples exceeded the acceptable exposure level (AEL) for sensitisation induction. Moreover, all samples exceeding the AEL fell above the acceptable non-eliciting area dose for contact dermatitis (ANEAD).
Conclusion:
We developed and validated a physiologically relevant method to quantify diisocyanate residues leaching from wound dressings, demonstrating that HDI, in particular, poses a significant risk for sensitisation induction and can elicit ACD in individuals who are already sensitised.
More Related Videos
10:13Eye Irritation Test EIT for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial RhCE Tissue Model
Published on: August 23, 2015
06:45Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
Published on: May 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Acid-Base Balance
When the pH of arterial blood rises above 7.45, it results in a condition called alkalosis. Conversely, a drop below 7.35 leads to...
Disorders of Acid-Base Balance
Respiratory Acidosis and Alkalosis
Respiratory acidosis occurs due to an increase in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide PCO2 in the blood. It often arises from shallow breathing or impaired gas exchange caused by...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations: