Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

899
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
899
Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

42.9K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
42.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Playing With Matches: Preparatory Cognitive Processing Shapes Affective Evaluation.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Action Selection by Temporally Close Transitions? Subtle Evidence from the Removal of Tactile Stimulation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Correction: The representational nature of action-effect relations: A memory process dissociation approach.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Guiding gaze via gaze: Effect anticipation during intentional saccadic gaze leading.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.5K

Spatially incompatible tool use does not induce tactile neglect.

Yanick Kloss1, Wilfried Kunde2

  • 1Department of Psychology (III), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. yanick.kloss@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|December 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Operating incompatible tools may cause conflict, leading to potential "body neglect." However, this study found no evidence of tactile sensitivity reduction, suggesting body neglect does not impact touch processing.

Keywords:
Goal-directed movementsMotor controlPerception and action

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.5K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Operating tools that move incompatibly with the body can create conflicting sensory predictions.
  • It is hypothesized that individuals may down-regulate (neglect) body-related movement consequences to resolve this conflict.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether operating incompatibly moving tools induces body neglect.
  • To determine if tactile sensitivity is affected when body-related movement predictions conflict with environmental feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Participants operated tools with spatially compatible or incompatible movement relative to their hand.
  • Tactile sensitivity was measured during tool operation in four experiments.

Main Results:

  • No evidence for conflict-induced body neglect was found across all experiments.
  • Operating incompatibly moving tools did not lead to a reduction in tactile sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that any potential downregulation of body-related movement components does not extend to tactile processing.
  • These results have implications for understanding human interaction with incompatibly moving tools in applied settings.