Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.8K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.8K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

899
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
899
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.0K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

418
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
418
Vision01:24

Vision

59.2K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
59.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Magnetic sand": Illusions of interactivity.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Did you see the sound? A Bayesian Perspective on Crossmodal Perception in Low Vision.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Clinical Manifestations.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Multi-region investigation of 'man' as default in attitudes.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Visual cortical thickness increases with prolonged artificial vision restoration.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same journal

Layered social competition coordinates reproductive hierarchy formation in ants.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Combination epigenetic-targeted therapy increases the immunogenicity of poorly immunogenic sarcomas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Loss of LanC-like proteins delays post-injury regeneration of aging skeletal muscles.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Integrative Transfer Network: Deep Transfer Learning Across Populations and Prediction Targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Confidence-supported label-free metabolic imaging with FPhaS phase autofluorescence microscopy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Sequence-encoded autoinhibition couples mRNA decapping activity to phase separation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.4K

Bayesian Causal Inference Accounts for Multisensory Filling-In at the Blind Spot.

Ailene Y C Chan1, Noelle R B Stiles1,2, Carmel A Levitan1,3

  • 1California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|December 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multisensory integration persists even without visual input at the blind spot. The brain adapts sensory uncertainties, maintaining core causal inference computations for perception.

Keywords:
AuditionBlindspotFilling-inIllusionMultisensoryVision

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.8K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

841

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.4K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.8K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

841

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Multisensory perception relies on integrating information from different senses.
  • The physiological blind spot lacks direct retinal input, posing a challenge for visual processing.
  • Understanding how the brain processes information in the absence of direct sensory input is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if audiovisual integration occurs without bottom-up visual input across the blind spot.
  • To determine if the brain adjusts sensory uncertainties and priors in the blind spot.
  • To assess if causal-inference computations are preserved in the blind spot.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged audiovisual illusions presented across the blind spot and a control location.
  • Bayesian Causal Inference (BCI) models were used to analyze responses.
  • Sensory noise, priors, and causal-inference strategies were estimated and compared.

Main Results:

  • Audiovisual illusions were robust at both the blind spot and control locations, indicating preserved integration.
  • The Bayesian Causal Inference model revealed higher visual uncertainty and broader prior expectations at the blind spot.
  • Auditory precision and the causal prior remained stable, suggesting flexible adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptual inference remains intact even in the absence of retinal input.
  • The brain flexibly adapts internal sensory uncertainty rather than altering core multisensory computations.
  • The computational architecture for causal inference is preserved across sensory-deprived regions.