Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018
Additive Clinical Utility of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden to Predict Immune Checkpoint
Nicolas Sayegh1,2, Ryon P Graf3, Umang Swami1
1Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show improved outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with high tumor mutational burden (tTMB) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) disease. Blood-based MSI (bMSI) also predicts favorable ICI response when tissue testing is unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Genomics
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate limited efficacy in unselected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
- Current approvals for ICIs in mCRPC are restricted to biomarker-defined subsets, specifically microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and/or high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H).
- The efficacy of ICIs in TMB-H but not MSI-H disease, and outcomes associated with blood-based MSI (bMSI) in mCRPC, remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in mCRPC based on tissue-assessed MSI (tMSI) and TMB (tTMB) status.
- To assess ICI outcomes in relation to blood-based MSI (bMSI) status.
- To compare ICI efficacy with taxane treatment in patients with tTMB ≥ 10.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the US-based deidentified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine prostate cancer Clinico-Genomic Database (FH-FMI CGDB).
- Included patients with tMSI and tTMB status treated with single-agent ICI, or ICI or taxane for bMSI assessment.
- Analyzed time to treatment failure (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) based on biomarker status.
Main Results:
- Among 2,965 mCRPC patients, tMSI-H (3.2%) frequently overlapped with tTMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb (4.7%).
- In 84 ICI-treated patients, tMSI-H and tTMB ≥ 10 (without tMSI-H) were associated with significantly more favorable TTNT and OS compared to tTMB < 10.
- Blood-based MSI-H detection correlated with improved TTNT and OS on ICI when tumor fraction was ≥ 1%.
Conclusions:
- Tissue-assessed TMB and MSI are valuable biomarkers for predicting ICI monotherapy benefit in mCRPC.
- Blood-based MSI testing offers a viable alternative for predicting ICI response when tissue is unavailable.
- These findings support expanded use of genomic biomarkers to guide ICI treatment selection in mCRPC.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
07:25A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018