Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

High Throughput In Vitro Assessment of Latency Reversing Agents on HIV Transcription and Splicing
Published on: January 22, 2019
HIV Prevention for People Releasing from Incarceration: A Qualitative Pre-implementation Study
Emily Callen1, Susan M Graham2,3, Winter Forsyth4
1Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. ejcallen@uw.edu.
Release from jail poses high HIV risk. HIV prevention services like pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) face barriers in carceral settings, with basic needs often prioritized over specialized HIV care.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Implementation Science
- Infectious Disease Prevention
Background:
- Release from incarceration is a critical period for HIV acquisition.
- Existing efforts to provide HIV prevention, including pre-pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), face significant implementation challenges for justice-involved populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the landscape of HIV prevention implementation for individuals transitioning from carceral facilities in Washington State.
- To gather insights from correctional and community organization staff to guide the implementation of effective HIV prevention strategies.
Main Methods:
- A qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with 15 carceral staff and 20 community-based organization staff.
- Participants were recruited using chain referral sampling.
- Interviews were coded using a mixed inductive-deductive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Main Results:
- Carceral facilities offered limited HIV prevention programs, with PrEP availability not widespread and focus on acute medical/behavioral health needs.
- Community organizations prioritized basic needs and community building over specific HIV prevention services.
- Key themes included the prioritization of basic needs, the need for new funding for HIV prevention, cultural differences impacting PrEP provision, disconnects between carceral and community providers hindering care linkage, and balancing confidentiality with care coordination.
Conclusions:
- Both carceral institutions and community organizations often focus on substance use disorder treatment, presenting an opportunity to integrate HIV prevention education and interventions.
- Enhanced collaboration between carceral and community organizations could improve care coordination but necessitates adequate staff capacity.
More Related Videos
14:23A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
08:05A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Retrovirus Life Cycles