Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
Published on: March 24, 2019
Gamma 3 vs Gamma 3 RC in Unstable Extracapsular Hip Fractures: A Prospective Randomized study
Jose Antonio Valle-Cruz1, Yaiza Lopiz2,3, Daniel Garríguez-Pérez1
1Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Purpose:
Rotational instability is a key factor in fixation failure of extracapsular hip fractures. The U-Blade (RC) lag screw was designed to improve rotational stability. This study aimed to compare mechanical complication rates between Gamma3 and Gamma3 RC nails in elderly patients with rotationally unstable extracapsular fractures.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial including 316 patients aged ≥ 65 years with rotationally unstable extracapsular fractures. Patients were randomized to treatment with a Gamma3 nail (n = 169) or a Gamma3 RC nail (n = 147). Mechanical complications were classified as major (rotation and migration of the implant, cut-out, non-union) or minor (back-out, cervicodiaphyseal angle change, excessive sliding).
Results:
The overall rate of major complications was 2.9 per 10,000 person-days, being the most frequent the cut out (2.2%), with no significant difference between Gamma3 and Gamma3 RC groups (RR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.4-2.7). TAD > 25 mm increased the risk of major complications (RT = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.2-11.2), as did superior screw placement (Cleveland zones 1-3: RT = 7.5; 95% CI: 2.7-20.8) and postoperative diastasis (RT = 4.7; 95% CI: 1.4-16.2). Similarly, implant type was not significantly associated with minor complications that were observed in 85 patients (26.9%), most frequently back-out (14.6%).
Conclusion:
The U-Blade (RC) lag screw did not reduce mechanical complication rates compared with the standard Gamma3. Radiographic parameters, particularly TAD, reduction quality, screw position, and postoperative diastasis, were the main predictors of fixation failure.
More Related Videos
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Bone Remodeling and Repair