Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Where to invest in neonatal survival programs in Nepal? A modelling study using Lives Saved Tool through scaling key
Geha Nath Khanal1,2, Nisha Giri3, Deepak Jha4
1Nepal Public Health Association, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Background:
Neonatal survival remains a major public health priority in many low and middle-income countries including Nepal, where the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) is 21 per 1,000 live births. To improve the neonatal health outcomes, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends scaling up coverage of quality antenatal care (ANC), skilled care at birth, immediate essential newborn care and resuscitation, postnatal care for mother and newborn, and specialized care of small and sick newborns. In this context, we aimed to estimate the potential impact of achieving the coverage targets for 35 interventions, identified as monitoring indicators under Nepal's Every Newborn Action Plan (NENAP), on neonatal survival in Nepal by 2035.
Methods:
We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate the number of neonatal deaths that could be prevented by 2035 if target intervention coverage level is achieved, starting from 2025 baseline values. Baseline data were drawn from demographic and health (DHS) survey and multiple indicator cluster survey (MICS). Where survey data were unavailable, proxy estimates were derived from available literatures to establish the baseline levels.
Results:
By 2035, achieving the target coverage level could save an estimated 8,126 neonatal lives compared to the 2025 baseline. This achievement would reduce the NMR to about 14 per 1,000 live births and avert an additional 5,977 child deaths and 358 maternal deaths. More than two-third (70.4%) of neonatal lives saved would be attributable to four priority interventions: neonatal resuscitation (36.0%), promotion of breastfeeding practices (11.8%), case management of neonatal sepsis (11.7%) and case management of premature babies (10.9%). At this coverage level, approximately 26.9% of deaths due to prematurity, 17.9% from sepsis, and 16.1% from diarrhoea could be prevented.
Conclusion:
Nepal must prioritize highly effective interventions: neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, management of neonatal sepsis and case management of premature babies to accelerate progress towards the NENAP target. Our analysis indicates that achieving the specific coverage targets of 35 NENAP interventions could reduce the NMR to 14 per 1,000 live births which fall short of the NENAP targets of reducing NMR to 11 per 1,000 live births by 2035. Strengthening special newborn care unit (SNCU) in line with WHO standard is critical to improving the quality of care for small and sick newborns (SSNB) in health facilities. While strengthening newborn resuscitation and SNCU services will substantially reduce NMR, attaining the NENAP targets will ultimately require comprehensive health system reforms and effective coverage of other maternal and newborn interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Applications of Life Tables
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

