Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.8K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.5K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.5K
Gaussian Elimination: Problem Solving01:30

Gaussian Elimination: Problem Solving

146
Systems of linear equations in several variables are pivotal in modeling complex scenarios involving multiple unknowns and constraints. Such systems are widely used in various fields to represent relationships where several conditions must be simultaneously satisfied. Each variable in the system corresponds to an unknown quantity, while each equation imposes a linear constraint, leading to a structured approach for analyzing and solving real-world problems.A system of three equations with three...
146
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

538
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
538
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.9K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.9K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.4K
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autoantibodies to IL-1Ra and PGRN in severe COVID-19 are associated with inflammation-induced hyperphosphorylated antigen isoforms.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Plasmacytic markers as immunotherapeutic targets for primary CD20-negative aggressive B-cell lymphomas.

British journal of haematology·2026
Same author

Reprogramming of stroma-derived chemokine networks drives the loss of tissue organization in nodal B cell lymphoma.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Impact of Perforin 1 A91V germ line background in patients with aggressive B-NHL treated with R-CHOP.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Evolving Populations of Solved Subgraphs with Crossover and Constraint Repair.

Evolutionary computation·2026
Same author

Axicabtagene ciloleucel in combination with rituximab for refractory large B cell lymphoma: the phase 2, single-arm ZUMA-14 trial.

Nature cancer·2026
Same journal

Computing Optimal Populations for Binary Problems using Logic Minimization.

Evolutionary computation·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Generalization and Scalability for Multi-Objective Optimization with Population Pre-Training.

Evolutionary computation·2026
Same journal

XCS for Sequential Perceptual Aliasing in Multi-Step Decision Making.

Evolutionary computation·2026
Same journal

A dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using dual-space prediction and surrogate-based sampling.

Evolutionary computation·2026
Same journal

Adapting MOEA/D to CMA-ES for Dealing with Ill-conditioned Multiobjective Problems.

Evolutionary computation·2026
Same journal

Editorial of the Special Issue: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN 2024 Extended Versions of Best Paper Candidates.

Evolutionary computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.4K

Runtime Analysis of Evolutionary Diversity Optimization on the Multi-objective (LeadingOnes, TrailingZeros) Problem.

Denis Antipov1, Aneta Neumann2, Frank Neumann3

  • 1LIP6, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75252, France denis.antipov@lip6.fr.

Evolutionary Computation
|December 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evolutionary diversity optimization (EDO) algorithms efficiently find diverse solutions. This study analyzes EDO on the LOTZk benchmark, proving GSEMOD achieves optimal diversity faster for total imbalance than for sorted imbalances vector.

Keywords:
Diversity optimizationMulti-objective optimizationTheory

More Related Videos

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

14.9K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.4K
A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

14.9K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Optimization algorithms
  • Evolutionary computation
  • Multi-objective optimization

Background:

  • Diversity optimization seeks a set of varied high-quality solutions.
  • Evolutionary algorithms are commonly used for this purpose, termed Evolutionary Diversity Optimization (EDO).
  • Analyzing EDO performance on benchmark problems is crucial for understanding its efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the performance of Evolutionary Diversity Optimization (EDO) algorithms.
  • To evaluate the runtime of GSEMOD for achieving optimal diversity on the LOTZk benchmark.
  • To compare theoretical bounds with empirical results for different diversity measures.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of the GSEMO and GSEMOD algorithms.
  • Runtime analysis using expected iterations for Pareto-optimal and diverse solutions.
  • Empirical study on the three-objective LOTZk benchmark function.
  • Evaluation of two diversity measures: total imbalance and sorted imbalances vector.

Main Results:

  • GSEMO computes all Pareto-optimal solutions in O(kn3) expected iterations.
  • GSEMOD optimizes total imbalance in O(kn2log n) expected iterations, faster than finding Pareto-optimal solutions.
  • GSEMOD has an upper bound of O(k2n3log n) expected iterations for optimizing the sorted imbalances vector.
  • Empirical results align with theoretical analysis, suggesting tight bounds for total imbalance and pessimistic bounds for the imbalances vector.

Conclusions:

  • The GSEMOD algorithm demonstrates efficient convergence for diversity optimization.
  • Theoretical bounds provide insights into algorithm performance for different diversity metrics.
  • The study validates EDO's effectiveness and identifies areas for further refinement in theoretical analysis.