Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wide Awake Facial Reconstruction: A Literature Review, Cost Analysis, and Practical Guide.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

The Natural Evolution of Macroglossia Among Beckwith-Wiedemann Patients: A 30-Year Institutional Review.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Building an Interdisciplinary Clinic for Upper Extremity Reconstruction in Spinal Cord Injury: The Montreal TetraHand Experience.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Hemifacial Microsomia.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2025
Same author

Cost of Care and Surgical Outcomes between Direct-to-Implant and Staged Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025
Same author

Flap reconstruction of post-burn neck contractures: A systematic review.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

7.0K

3-Dimensional Simulation for Breast Augmentation: Does the Software Actually Work?

Elisabeth Lorange1, Gabriel Bouhadana1, Noah Oiknine1

  • 1From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|December 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The VECTRA 3D imaging system accurately predicts breast augmentation volumes within 10% error for most patients. Patient factors like pregnancy history influence prediction accuracy, aiding preoperative consultations.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
07:16

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.8K
Quantification of Breast Cancer Cell Invasiveness Using a Three-dimensional 3D Model
08:08

Quantification of Breast Cancer Cell Invasiveness Using a Three-dimensional 3D Model

Published on: June 11, 2014

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
07:16

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.8K
Quantification of Breast Cancer Cell Invasiveness Using a Three-dimensional 3D Model
08:08

Quantification of Breast Cancer Cell Invasiveness Using a Three-dimensional 3D Model

Published on: June 11, 2014

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Medical Imaging Technology

Background:

  • 3D imaging systems, like VECTRA XT, are used for breast augmentation simulations.
  • Previous studies lacked large-scale evaluation of VECTRA XT's predictive volume accuracy and influencing factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive volume accuracy of the VECTRA 3D imaging system for breast augmentation.
  • To identify patient-specific and surgical factors influencing simulation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study of 78 patients (154 breasts) undergoing VECTRA 3D simulations (Jan 2021-Dec 2022).
  • Analysis of volumetric accuracy using a ±10% threshold and Bland-Altman plots.
  • Generalized linear model identified factors affecting prediction accuracy.

Main Results:

  • 73% of simulations achieved accurate predictions (±10% error), with a 7.52% average margin of error.
  • Sternal-nipple measurements were most accurate; nipple-IMF measurements were least accurate.
  • Pregnancy history, preoperative breast volume, and implant volume influenced prediction accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The VECTRA 3D system demonstrates high accuracy in predicting postoperative breast volumes, with limitations for larger volumes (>650cc).
  • Patient-specific factors are crucial for accurate preoperative consultations and shared decision-making.
  • The system enhances patient education and engagement in breast augmentation planning.