Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Prediction of traction time for the alignment of impacted maxillary canines
Cristina de-la-Rosa-Gay1,2, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón1,2, Rui Figueiredo3,4
1Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Pavelló de Govern; 2a planta, Despatx 2.9 C/Feixa Llarga s/n, E-08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
To identify which factors influence the traction time of impacted maxillary canines using a combined orthodontic-surgical approach and to create a multivariate model to predict canine traction time.
Methods:
Patients undergoing traction of impacted maxillary canines by a single orthodontist were selected. Seventy patients (mean age ± SD): 19.32 ± 8.81) meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. They had 89 impacted canines (69 palatally displaced and 20 in a buccal position). Variables that could be related to orthodontic treatment as a whole and to impaction and its treatment were recorded for each patient. The treatment predictors were explored by univariate Cox regression and multivariate generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). A multivariate analysis was performed using a mixed-effects parametric survival analysis (MMPSA) Weibull model to assess the contribution of each of the predictive variables and to create a multiple linear regression model to explain canine traction time.
Results:
Cox regression showed significant association between traction time and age (p = 0.013) and the number of failed appointments (p < 0.001). An MMPSA Weibull model to build a predictive model based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) showed that interceptive maxillary expansion significantly reduced traction time (p = 0.002). In contrast, traction time increased with a wider angle of the impacted canine relative to the midline, with missed appointments, and with radiological overlap with lateral or central incisors.
Conclusions:
The orthodontic treatment time to align impacted maxillary canines increases with radiological overlap with lateral and central incisors, a wider angle to the midline, the absence of interceptive maxillary expansion, and missed appointments.

