Re-evaluating patient isolation policies for musculoskeletal infections in orthopaedic practice: a scoping review
Laura Bessems1,2, Jolien Onsea1,2, Baixing Chen1,2
1Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Abstract:
Introduction: Historically, isolating patients diagnosed with musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) from the general orthopaedic population has been regarded a fundamental aspect of effective infection control. However, this remains controversial. Evolving perspectives on infection prevention, resource constraints, and staffing shortages necessitate a reassessment of current practices. This scoping review examines existing isolation policies for MSIs in orthopaedic practice and provides expert recommendations for hospital policymakers. Materials and methods: A systematic search of seven databases identified 23 320 articles. After deduplication and screening of 10 621 abstracts, 119 full texts were reviewed and 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 9 studies involved surgical wards, 5 examined general hospital wards, and 2 addressed orthopaedic patients. Results: Evidence indicates that individual isolation measures can reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, whereas additional contact precautions or isolation showed no reduction of transmission risk for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in endemic settings. For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), one study found a reduction in infections after implementing individual isolation, while another study reported no impact. No evidence supports separating patients with non-resistant MSIs from elective orthopaedic patients. Similarly, no data support the routine use of dedicated septic wards in orthopaedic practice. Conclusions: Effective infection control relies on hospital-wide strategies, provided that appropriate preventive measures and a high level of compliance with standard precautions are in place. Isolation practices should be selectively tailored to local epidemiology to balance infection prevention with optimal resource utilization. Managing MSIs in specialized centres, instead of dedicated septic wards, may deliver more effective care and adherence to standard precautions.
Insights
Isolating patients with musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) is debated. Evidence suggests tailored, hospital-wide strategies and standard precautions are key for infection control, not routine isolation.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Hospital Infection Control
Background:
- Historically, patient isolation for musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) was standard practice.
- Evolving infection prevention strategies, resource limitations, and staffing shortages prompt a re-evaluation of MSI isolation policies.
- This scoping review critically assesses current isolation practices for MSIs in orthopaedic settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine existing isolation policies for musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) in orthopaedic practice.
- To provide expert recommendations for hospital policymakers regarding MSI isolation.
- To evaluate the evidence for specific isolation measures against various pathogens.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search across seven databases.
- Screening of over 10,000 abstracts and review of 119 full-text articles.
- Inclusion of 14 studies focusing on isolation in surgical wards, general hospital wards, and orthopaedic patients.
Main Results:
- Individual isolation may reduce methicillin-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA) infections.
- No significant reduction in transmission risk for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing *Enterobacterales* or vancomycin-resistant *Enterococcus* (VRE) with additional precautions.
- No evidence supports separating non-resistant MSI patients or routine dedicated septic wards in orthopaedics.
Conclusions:
- Effective infection control requires comprehensive, hospital-wide strategies and high compliance with standard precautions.
- Isolation practices should be individualized based on local epidemiology and resource availability.
- Managing MSIs in specialized centers, rather than dedicated septic wards, may enhance care and adherence to precautions.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...


