Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Precise Reconstruction of Mandibular Angle Defects Using Digital Technology-Assisted Vascularized Iliac Crest Flap
Yuanqing Huang1, Linfeng Qiu1, Min Gan2
1Resident, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Background:
Fibula and iliac crest flaps are widely used for mandibular reconstruction, but accurate restoration of the mandibular angle using iliac flaps remains challenging and may affect postoperative aesthetics.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular angle contour, donor-site function, and quality-of-life outcomes between subjects who underwent digitally assisted mandibular angle reconstruction using pedicled iliac crest flaps alone and those treated with vascularized iliac crest flaps combined with nonvascularized iliac bone grafts.
Study Design, Setting, And Sample:
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent mandibular angle reconstruction at our institution between July 2019 and December 2022. Exclusion criteria included malignancy, prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and systemic contraindications.
Predictor Variable:
The predictor variable was the reconstructive technique, and subjects were divided into 2 groups: pedicled deep circumflex iliac artery flap alone versus vascularized iliac crest flap combined with nonvascularized iliac bone graft.
Main Outcome Variables:
Primary outcome variables included three-dimensional mandibular measurements-mandibular body and ramus lengths, their angles relative to the midsagittal and Frankfort planes, visual mandibular angle, and bone graft resorption rate. Secondary outcomes were donor-site function (Harris Hip Score), quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Qualtiy of Life Questionnaire-Heard and Neck Cancer Module 35 [EORTC QLQ-H&N35]), hospitalization cost, and operative time.
Covariates:
Covariates included age, sex, defect length, pathology, and follow-up time.
Analyses:
Depending on data distribution, parametric or nonparametric tests were used. Significance was set at P < .05.
Results:
A total of 17 subjects were included (7 [41.2%] deep circumflex iliac artery flap [DCIA] + vascularized iliac crest flap combined with nonvascularized iliac bone graft [NVIBG]; 10 [58.8%] DCIA), with a median follow-up of 32 months (interquartile range: 13-83) and defect length of 67.84 ± 8.40 mm. The DCIA + NVIBG group showed smaller discrepancies in mandibular angle contour-including body length (1.48 ± 0.68 mm vs 9.68 ± 3.49 mm), RL-Frankfort horizontal plane (1.53 ± 0.82° vs 2.98 ± 0.59°), RL-midsagittal plane (0.64 ± 0.38° vs 3.20 ± 0.70°), and visual angle difference (2.61 ± 1.21° vs 8.48 ± 2.37°) (all P < .01). Bone resorption ranged from 13.37 to 18.85%. No significant differences were found in hospitalization, operative time, donor-site function, or quality of life (P > .05).
Conclusions And Relevance:
Combining vascularized and nonvascularized iliac bone grafts improved mandibular angle contour restoration without increasing postoperative complications or affecting quality of life.
