Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Determining the Mechanical Strength of Ultra-Fine-Grained Metals
Published on: November 22, 2021
Atomistic investigation of grain boundary strengthening and composition-dependent mechanical properties in CuNi
Sanzida Naznin Mim1, Zihad Hossain1, Md Lokman Ali1
1Department of Physics, Pabna University of Science and Technology Pabna 6600 Bangladesh lokman.cu12@gmail.com.
Abstract:
This work examines the influence of grain boundary (GB) and chemical composition on the elastic and mechanical properties of CuNi binary alloys through molecular dynamics simulations. Three configurations, a defect-free single crystal (GB Non) and two symmetric tilt GBs, Σ5 (310) and Σ13 (314), were evaluated across five compositions. The computed elastic constants reveal that C 11 consistently exceeds C 12 and C 44 (C 11 = 185.03, C 12 = 124.34, and C 44 = 88.99 for Cu0.50Ni0.50) a characteristic signature of FCC alloys. The introduction of GBs enhances stiffness, indicating a structural strengthening effect attributed to local atomic rearrangements, with the magnitude of enhancement varying by composition. All configurations satisfy the Born-Huang mechanical stability criteria, confirming their elastic stability. Across all compositions, Young's modulus (E) remains the highest among the three moduli, reflecting the alloys pronounced resistance to uniaxial tensile deformation. Stress-strain analysis further highlights the superior performance of GB Σ13, which exhibits the highest peak stress among all configurations, with peak strength increasing progressively with higher Cu content. This correlates with its highest hardness and melting point (1463.43 K) as well as enhanced machinability compared to GB Non and GB Σ5 with highest Cu concentrations. Cauchy pressure, Poisson's ratio, Pugh's ratio, and Frantsevich's criterion consistently classify the alloys as ductile, while direction-dependent properties reveal anisotropic behavior. Furthermore, reversing the Cu/Ni ratio has negligible impact on the elastic response for GB Non and GB Σ5, as observed for Cu0.375Ni0.625 and Cu0.625Ni0.375. These results provide atomistic insights into the interplay between GB structure, composition, and mechanical performance, offering valuable guidance for optimizing CuNi alloys in structural applications.
Related Concept Videos
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Bonding in Metals

